Notes of Decisions
Cited in
55
cases, 1982–2013 · leading case:
In Re Gronski, 65 B.R. 932 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1986).
In Re Gronski, 65 B.R. 932 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1986).
· cites it 16× “This case, in its present posture, requires us to consider whether a debt incurred under the Health Education Assistance Loan Program, 42 U.S.C. § 294f (hereinafter “HEAL”) constitutes an additional exception to 11 U.”
Hines v. United States (In Re Hines), 63 B.R. 731 (Bankr. D.S.D. 1986).
· cites it 11× “Debtor substantively alleges that: 1) Because the loan which was received pursuant to the Health Education Assistance Loan Act (HEAL) has been due and owing for more than a five-year period prior to filing, the debt is dischargeable under Bankruptcy Code Section 523(a)(8); or 2)…”
United States v. Cleveland (In Re Cleveland), 89 B.R. 69 (9th Cir. BAP 1988).
· cites it 12× “” 42 U.S.C. §§ 294f(f)-(g). 7 The obvious rationale for the allowance of discharge under the above circumstances is that HEAL borrowers generally enter lucrative careers in the health care profession, however, in some circumstances (as in the instant case) a HEAL borrower who is…”
United States v. Randall K. Wood, 925 F.2d 1580 (7th Cir. 1991).
· cites it 3× “The district court granted the government’s motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) and denied Wood’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. The district court found that the bankruptcy court had not determined that the nondischarge…”
United States v. Green (In Re Green), 82 B.R. 955 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1988).
· cites it 8× “FACTS On November 2, 1979 Paula Eubanks Green, (the “Debtor”), obtained a Health Education Assistance Loan, (“HEAL” loan), pursuant to the Health Professions Educational Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 294f et seq. (the “Act”), in the amount of $6,362.”
Emnett v. United States (In Re Emnett), 127 B.R. 599 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 1991).
· cites it 7× “William Proctor Emnett (Emnett), the above debtor, seeks to discharge a Health Education Assistance Loan (HEAL) debt pursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 294f(g). The parties agree that only paragraph 2 of that section, allowing discharge “upon a finding by the Bankruptcy…”
In Re Gronski, 86 B.R. 428 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1988).
· cites it 5× “00 monthly increase in plan payments to $200.00 monthly. In our previous Opinion, we denied an Objection of the USA to Confirmation of the Debtor’s Plan.”
United States v. Hampton (In Re Hampton), 47 B.R. 47 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1985).
· cites it 6× “loan is not dischargeable unless the three conditions required by 42 U.S.C. § 294f(g) are met. That section provides: § 294f (g) A debt which is a loan insured under the authority of this subpart may be released by a discharge in bankruptcy under Title 11 only if such discharge…”
United States v. Lee, 89 B.R. 250 (N.D. Ga. 1987).
· cites it 3× “§ 1328 (a) or by 42 U.S.C. § 294f(g) and when during a Chapter 13 case may the government raise the dischargeability issue.”
Bryant v. Pennsylvania Higher Educ. Assistance Agency (In Re Bryant), 72 B.R. 913 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1987).
· cites it 2× “Secondly, we are able to point out that this element is distinct from the analysis in which we would engage in determining whether a loan obligation pursuant to the Health Education Assistance Loan Act Program, 42 U.S.C. § 294f et seq. (hereinafter referred to as “HEAL”), may be…”
Greco v. Sallie Mae Servicing Corp. (In Re Greco), 251 B.R. 670 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2000).
· cites it 3× “§ 523 (a)(8), and that failing to discharge them would be unconscionable pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 294f(g). Further, she asserted a Count asserting “[u]constitutionality of 523(a)(8) as applied because it represents a proscribed Ex-post Facto law and [ijmpairment of [cjontract.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 294f(a) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 294f(f) — 3 cases
United States v. Green (In Re Green), 82 B.R. 955 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1988).
“FACTS On November 2, 1979 Paula Eubanks Green, (the “Debtor”), obtained a Health Education Assistance Loan, (“HEAL” loan), pursuant to the Health Professions Educational Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 294f et seq. (the “Act”), in the amount of $6,362.”
United States v. Cleveland (In Re Cleveland), 89 B.R. 69 (9th Cir. BAP 1988).
“” 42 U.S.C. §§ 294f(f)-(g). 7 The obvious rationale for the allowance of discharge under the above circumstances is that HEAL borrowers generally enter lucrative careers in the health care profession, however, in some circumstances (as in the instant case) a HEAL borrower who is…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 294f(g) — 50 cases
In Re Gronski, 65 B.R. 932 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1986).
“This case, in its present posture, requires us to consider whether a debt incurred under the Health Education Assistance Loan Program, 42 U.S.C. § 294f (hereinafter “HEAL”) constitutes an additional exception to 11 U.”
Hines v. United States (In Re Hines), 63 B.R. 731 (Bankr. D.S.D. 1986).
“Debtor substantively alleges that: 1) Because the loan which was received pursuant to the Health Education Assistance Loan Act (HEAL) has been due and owing for more than a five-year period prior to filing, the debt is dischargeable under Bankruptcy Code Section 523(a)(8); or 2)…”
United States v. Cleveland (In Re Cleveland), 89 B.R. 69 (9th Cir. BAP 1988).
“” 42 U.S.C. §§ 294f(f)-(g). 7 The obvious rationale for the allowance of discharge under the above circumstances is that HEAL borrowers generally enter lucrative careers in the health care profession, however, in some circumstances (as in the instant case) a HEAL borrower who is…”
United States v. Randall K. Wood, 925 F.2d 1580 (7th Cir. 1991).
“The district court granted the government’s motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) and denied Wood’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. The district court found that the bankruptcy court had not determined that the nondischarge…”
Emnett v. United States (In Re Emnett), 127 B.R. 599 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 1991).
“William Proctor Emnett (Emnett), the above debtor, seeks to discharge a Health Education Assistance Loan (HEAL) debt pursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 294f(g). The parties agree that only paragraph 2 of that section, allowing discharge “upon a finding by the Bankruptcy…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 294f(g)(1) — 1 case
United States v. Green (In Re Green), 82 B.R. 955 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1988).
“FACTS On November 2, 1979 Paula Eubanks Green, (the “Debtor”), obtained a Health Education Assistance Loan, (“HEAL” loan), pursuant to the Health Professions Educational Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 294f et seq. (the “Act”), in the amount of $6,362.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 294f(g)(2) — 7 cases
Hines v. United States (In Re Hines), 63 B.R. 731 (Bankr. D.S.D. 1986).
“Debtor substantively alleges that: 1) Because the loan which was received pursuant to the Health Education Assistance Loan Act (HEAL) has been due and owing for more than a five-year period prior to filing, the debt is dischargeable under Bankruptcy Code Section 523(a)(8); or 2)…”
Bryant v. Pennsylvania Higher Educ. Assistance Agency (In Re Bryant), 72 B.R. 913 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1987).
“Secondly, we are able to point out that this element is distinct from the analysis in which we would engage in determining whether a loan obligation pursuant to the Health Education Assistance Loan Act Program, 42 U.S.C. § 294f et seq. (hereinafter referred to as “HEAL”), may be…”
In Re Gronski, 86 B.R. 428 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1988).
“00 monthly increase in plan payments to $200.00 monthly. In our previous Opinion, we denied an Objection of the USA to Confirmation of the Debtor’s Plan.”
In Re Gronski, 65 B.R. 932 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1986).
“This case, in its present posture, requires us to consider whether a debt incurred under the Health Education Assistance Loan Program, 42 U.S.C. § 294f (hereinafter “HEAL”) constitutes an additional exception to 11 U.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 294f(g)(3) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 294f(g)(l) — 2 cases
In Re Gronski, 65 B.R. 932 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1986).
“This case, in its present posture, requires us to consider whether a debt incurred under the Health Education Assistance Loan Program, 42 U.S.C. § 294f (hereinafter “HEAL”) constitutes an additional exception to 11 U.”
In Re Gronski, 86 B.R. 428 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1988).
“00 monthly increase in plan payments to $200.00 monthly. In our previous Opinion, we denied an Objection of the USA to Confirmation of the Debtor’s Plan.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.