42 U.S.C. § 3614a
Rules to implement subchapter
The Secretary may make rules (including rules for the collection, maintenance, and analysis of appropriate data) to carry out this subchapter. The Secretary shall give public notice and opportunity for comment with respect to all rules made under this section.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1992–2023 · leading case: Mhany Mgmt., Inc. v. Cnty. of Nassau, 819 F.3d 581 (2d Cir. 2016).
Mhany Mgmt., Inc. v. Cnty. of Nassau, 819 F.3d 581 (2d Cir. 2016). “Section 808(a)- of the FHA gives the Secretary of HUD the “authority and re-? sponsibility for administering [the] Act,” 42 U.S.C. § 3608 (a), and confers upon the Secretary authority to “make rules (including rules for the collection, maintenance, and analysis of appropriate…”
Warren v. Delvista Towers Condo. Ass'n, 49 F. Supp. 3d 1082 (S.D. Fla. 2014). “” 42 U.S.C. § 3614a. In exercising that authority, the Secretary has promulgated 24 C.”
The Sch. of the Ozarks, Inc. v. Joseph Biden, Jr., 41 F.4th 992 (8th Cir. 2022). “4 42 U.S.C. § 3614a. “[I]nterpretative rules simply state what the administrative agency thinks the statute means, and only remind affected parties of existing duties.”
Fair Hous. of the Dakotas, Inc. v. Goldmark Prop. Mgmt., Inc., 778 F. Supp. 2d 1028 (D.N.D. 2011). “42 U.S.C. §§ 3614a, 3612(a) & (o). The DOJ has consistently refused to apply the regulations governing the ADA in the context of residential housing governed by the FHA.”
Borum v. Brentwood Vill., LLC, 218 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2016). “See 42 U.S.C. § 3614a; see also Mhany Mgmt., Inc.”
Chicago Lawyers' Comm. for Civil Rights Under the Law, Inc. v. Craigslist, Inc., 461 F. Supp. 2d 681 (N.D. Ill. 2006). “§ 3608 , and may promulgate regulations to carry out the FHA, 42 U.S.C. § 3614a. 4 . In the two subsections immediately preceding Section 230(c), Congress identified certain findings and policies: (a) Findings.”
Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Am. Fam. Mut. Ins., 978 F.3d 287 (7th Cir. 1992). “” 42 U.S.C. § 3614a. Congress gave the Executive Branch this power with knowledge that since 1978 a succession of Secretaries have believed that “[ijnsurance redlining, by denying or impeding coverage[,] makes mortgage money unavailable,, rendering dwellings ‘unavailable’ as…”
Fair Hous. Council v. Penasquitos Casablanca Owner's Ass'n, 381 F. App'x 674 (9th Cir. 2010). “It provides that “prohibited actions under” § 3604(b) include “[ljimiting the use of privileges, services or facilities *678 associated with a dwelling because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin of an owner, tenant or a person associated…”
Wai v. Allstate Ins., 75 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 1999). “See 42 U.S.C. § 3614a. Pursuant to this authority, HUD issued regulations stating that “[Refusing to provide .”
United States v. City of Jackson, Mississippi, 318 F. Supp. 2d 395 (S.D. Miss. 2002). “When Congress amended the Act in 1988, it explicitly authorized the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development to issue legislative rules to implement the Act.”
Shapiro v. Cadman Towers, Inc., 844 F. Supp. 116 (E.D.N.Y 1994). “After restating the language of the statute, the regulation proceeds to give two examples of a reasonable accommodation.”
Ojo v. Farmers Grp., Inc., 600 F.3d 1205 (9th Cir. 2010). “For example, the denial of homeowner’s insurance can make housing unavailable: Mortgage lenders require prospective borrowers to obtain homeowner’s insurance, so without insurance, there may be no loan, and without a loan, there may be no home available to a person who wants to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.