42 U.S.C. § 3751
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1974–2017 · leading case: City of Chicago v. Sessions, 264 F. Supp. 3d 933 (N.D. Ill. 2017).
City of Chicago v. Sessions, 264 F. Supp. 3d 933 (N.D. Ill. 2017). “§ 10152 (formerly 42 U.S.C. § 3751 ). The Byrne JAG grant is known as a formula grant, which means funds are awarded based on a statutorily defined formula.”
City of Philadelphia v. Sessions, 280 F. Supp. 3d 579 (E.D. Pa. 2017). “§ 10152 (formerly 42 U.S.C. § 3751 ). A more robust understanding of federal grants, appearing below, is important to fully appreciate the contours of the JAG Program.”
People v. Hill, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3984 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001). “) Based on DAB’s recommendations, the Director of the FBI issued quality assurance standards in 1998 for the Combined DNA Index System and the national DNA database index. (FBI Congressional Statement on Forensic DNA Analysis (Mar.”
San Bernardino Cnty. Child. & Fam. Servs. Dep't v. R.B., 222 Cal. App. 4th 612 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013). “( 42 U.S.C. § 3751 (a).) d. Analysis Father argues that section 361.”
United States v. Hernandez, 615 F. Supp. 2d 601 (E.D. Mich. 2009). “” 42 U.S.C. § 3751 . Given the purpose of encouraging SORNA compliance and Justice Assistance Grants, the relationship between the condition and the withholding of federal funds cannot be deemed unrelated.”
Creekmore v. Attorney Gen. of Texas, 116 F. Supp. 2d 767 (E.D. Tex. 2000). “The purpose of the grant is to: assist States and units of local government in carrying out specific programs which offer a high probability of improving the functioning of the criminal justice system, with special emphasis on a nationwide and multilevel drug control strategy by…”
United States v. Cnty. of Hawaii, 473 F. Supp. 261 (D. Haw. 1979). “205 (current version at 42 U.S.C. § 3751 (1977)). In their Motion to Dismiss, defendants challenge the validity of the 1970 regulations, not in the context of the retroactivity issue, but under the assumption that plaintiffs cause of action is controlled by the 1970 regulations…”
Russell v. Law Enf't Assistance Admin., 637 F.2d 1255 (9th Cir. 1980). “Compare 42 U.S.C. §§ 3751 , 3796 (1976). We suspect that this overlap was due to overcautious drafting and note that LEAA itself considers both regulatory provisions applicable to the Benefits Act.”
Hardy v. Leonard, 377 F. Supp. 831 (10th Cir. 1974). “Section 501 of the Crime Control Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. § 3751 , amending the Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, permits LEAA to promulgate regulations to implement the purposes of the Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.