42 U.S.C. § 401
SHORT TITLE.
“This title may be cited as the ‘Radon Gas and Indoor Air Quality Research Act of 1986’.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4,214
cases (2,113 in the last 5 years), 1937–2026 · leading case: Schillo v. Kijakazi
Schillo v. Kijakazi (2022)
“Plaintiff-Appellant Brenda Lynn Schillo applied for Social Security Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401–434. After a hearing, an administrative law judge considered the medical opinions of Schillo’s…”
Heckler v. Day (1984)
“The question presented is the validity of an injunction issued on behalf of a statewide class that requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to adjudicate all future disputed disability claims under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U. S. C. § 401 et seq.,…”
New York v. United States (1992)
“§ 118 (Highway Trust Fund); *173 42 U. S. C. § 401 (a) (Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund); 42 U.”
Brenda Diedrich v. Nancy Berryhill (2017)
“…Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits under Title XVI of the act. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 401 et seq. (Title II), 1381 et seq. (Title XVI). SSI benefits are based on needs. To be eligible, a claimant must be “aged, blind or disabled,” and must have income and resources…”
Mathews v. Eldridge (1976)
“§§ 3101 (a), 3111 (a); 42 U. S. C. § 401 (b). It provides monthly benefits to disabled persons who have worked sufficiently long to have an insured status, and who have had substantial work experience in a specified interval directly preceding the onset of disability.”
Flemming v. Nestor (1960)
“§ 201, 42 U. S. C. § 401 . It was evidently contemplated that receipts would greatly exceed disbursements in the early years of operation of the system, and surplus funds are invested in government obligations, and the income returned to the Trust Fund.”
Barnhart v. Walton (2002)
“622 , as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 401 et seq. (1994 ed.”
Shalala v. Schaefer (1993)
“622 , as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 401 et seq. (1988 ed.”
Estrella v. Berryhill (2019)
“%20%C2%A7%C2%A7%20401"> 42 U.S.C. §§ 401 - 434 and 1381 - 1383.”
Sullivan v. Everhart (1990)
“1362 , as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 401 et seq. (1982 ed.”
Sims v. Apfel (2000)
“622 , 42 U. S. C. § 401 et seq., and for supplemental security income benefits under Title XVI of that Act, 86 Stat.”
Karen Lambert v. Andrew Saul (2020)
“Lambert applied for Disability Insurance Benefits, 42 U.S.C. § 401 , et seq.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 401(a) — 1 case
Authority for the Continuance of Government Functions During a Temporary Lapse in Appropriations (1981)
— 42 U.S.C. § 401(g) — 1 case
Chittenden v. Weinberger (1974)
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.