42 U.S.C. § 405
AUTHORIZATIONS.
“There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out the activities under this title and under section 118(k) of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (relating to radon gas assessment and demonstration program) [section 118(k) of Pub. L. 99–499, set out as a note above] not to exceed $5,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 1987, 1988, and 1989. Of such sums appropriated in fiscal years 1987 and 1988, two-fifths shall be reserved for the implementation of section 118(k)(2).”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 62,893
cases (35,167 in the last 5 years), 1942–2026 · leading case: Willie Ousley v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Willie Ousley v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. (2018)
“42 U.S.C. § 405 (u)(1)(A). The SSA may, however, delay redetermination proceedings if “a [state or federal prosecutor] with jurisdiction over potential or actual related criminal cases, certifies, in writing, that there is a substantial risk that such action by the Commissioner…”
Biestek v. Berryhill (2019)
“Biestek sought re- view in federal court, where an ALJ’s factual findings are “conclu- sive” if supported by “substantial evidence,” 42 U. S. C. §405 (g). The District Court rejected Biestek’s argument that the expert’s testimo- ny could not possibly constitute substantial…”
Heckler v. Ringer (1984)
“The United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissed the action for lack of jurisdiction, finding that in essence respondents are claiming entitlement to benefits for the BCBR procedure and therefore must exhaust their administrative remedies…”
Wall v. Astrue (2009)
“We have jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .”
Mathews v. Eldridge (1976)
“We there held that 42 U. S. C. § 405 (h) [7] precludes federal-question jurisdiction in an action challenging denial of claimed benefits.”
Califano v. Sanders (1977)
“Should a request for reconsideration prove unsuccessful, the claimant may, within 60 days, ask for an evidentiary hearing before an administrative law judge, 42 U. S. C. § 405 (b) (1970 ed., Supp. V), and a discretionary appeal from an adverse determination of the law judge lies…”
Bates v. Northwestern Human Services, Inc. (2006)
“In furtherance of these duties, one or more of the defendants were appointed by the SSA to act as a representative payee for certain District of Columbia residents, including the plaintiffs, who were entitled to receive federal Social Security and Supplemental Security Income…”
Treichler v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration (2014)
“In particular, Congress authorized the Commissioner to “make findings of fact, and decisions as to the rights of any individual applying for a payment” under the Act. Id. § 405(b)(1). By law, the disability determination is made by the Commissioner or authorized state agencies…”
Richardson v. Perales (1971)
“" [1] Section 205 (g), 42 U. S. C. § 405 (g), relating to judicial review, states, "The findings of the Secretary as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive .”
Weinberger v. Salfi (1975)
“I Appellee Salfi married the deceased wage earner, Londo L. Salfi, on May 27, 1972.”
Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc. (2000)
“§ 1395ii (incorporating into the Medicare Act 42 U. S. C. § 405 (h), which provides that "[n]o action .”
Gisbrecht v. Barnhart (2002)
“*797 B Petitioners Gary Gisbrecht, Barbara Miller, and Nancy Sandine brought three separate actions in the District Court for the District of Oregon under 42 U. S. C. § 405 (g) (1994 ed.), [5] seeking Social Security disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 405(a) — 8 cases
Goodnight v. Shalala (1993)
Frost v. Weinberger (1974)
Holt v. Bowen (1989)
Beecher v. Saul (2021)
— 42 U.S.C. § 405(b) — 11 cases
Fanning v. United States (2001)
Adams v. Califano (1979)
Miller v. Heckler (1985)
Schoultz v. Weinberger (1974)
— 42 U.S.C. § 405(b)(1) — 2 cases
REILLY v. SAUL (2024)
Schuh v. O'Malley (2024)
— 42 U.S.C. § 405(c) — 4 cases
White v. Celebrezze (1963)
Thacker v. Gardner (1967)
Crawford v. Cohen (1969)
Young v. Gardner (1968)
— 42 U.S.C. § 405(c)(2)(C)(iii) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 405(c)(2)(C)(viii) — 2 cases
— 42 U.S.C. § 405(c)(4)(C) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 405(e) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) — 1010 cases
Wells v. Barnhart (2003)
Burton v. Schweiker (1981)
— 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)(1991) — 1 case
Harzewski v. Chater (1997)
— 42 U.S.C. § 405(h) — 40 cases
Goodnight v. Shalala (1993)
Linquist v. Bowen (1986)
— 42 U.S.C. § 405(i) — 4 cases
Carver v. Heckler (1983)
— 42 U.S.C. § 405(j) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 405(j)(1)(A) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 405(r)(9)(A)(ii) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 405(u) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 405(u)(1)(A) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.