U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 73— DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY SOURCES › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION

42 U.S.C. § 502

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar
For the purposes of this title, the term ‘exempt shipments of plutonium’ shall include the following:“(1) Plutonium shipments in any form designed for medical application.“(2) Plutonium shipments which pursuant to rules promulgated by the Administrator of the Energy Research and Development Administration are determined to be made for purposes of national security, public health and safety, or emergency maintenance operations.“(3) Shipments of small amounts of plutonium deemed by the Administrator of the Energy Research and Development Administration to require rapid shipment by air in order to preserve the chemical, physical, or isotopic properties of the transported item or material.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 32 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1937–2025 · leading case: California Dep't of Human Resources Dev. v. Java, 402 U.S. 121 (1971).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
California Dep't of Human Resources Dev. v. Java, 402 U.S. 121 (1971). · cites it 2× “No grant may be made to a State for a fiscal year unless the Secretary of Labor certifies the amount to be paid, 42 U. S. C. § 502 (a). The Secretary of Labor may not certify payment of federal funds unless he first finds that the State's program conforms to federal requirements.”
Erspamer Advert. Co. v. Dep't of Labor, 333 N.W.2d 646 (Neb. 1983). · cites it 2× “(1976); 42 U.S.C. §§ 502 et seq. (1976); 29 U.S.C.”
United States v. Dennis D. Herring, 916 F.2d 1543 (11th Cir. 1990). · cites it 2× “Title 42 U.S.C. § 502 requires the Secretary to pay administrative funds to approved state unemployment programs from the United States Treasury.”
Indus. Comm'n v. Arteaga, 735 P.2d 473 (Colo. 1987). · cites it 2× “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 502 , 1101 (1982 & Supp.1987).”
Joseph Wilkinson v. Maurice Abrams, 627 F.2d 650 (3rd Cir. 1980). “42 U.S.C. § 502 (a). The Secretary may not certify payment of federal funds unless he first determines that the state’s program conforms to federal requirements.”
Torres v. New York State Dep't of Labor, 321 F. Supp. 432 (S.D.N.Y. 1971). · cites it 2× “42 U.S.C. §§ 502 , 503 (1964). Benefits are paid entirely out of a fund maintained solely by contributions, interest and penalties paid by employers.”
Acosta v. Brown, 213 Cal. App. 4th 234 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013). “( 42 U.S.C. §§ 502 , 503, 1101.) One of these requirements is the adoption of administrative measures “reasonably calculated to insure full payment of unemployment compensation when due.”
unempl.ins.rep. Cch 21,698 Juvena Jenkins v. William M. Bowling, Dir., Illinois Dep't of Labor, Defendants, 691 F.2d 1225 (7th Cir. 1982). “See 42 U.S.C. § 502 . But it does not follow that the concern behind section 303(a) is limited to administrative efficiency in a narrow sense.”
United States v. Facchini, 874 F.2d 638 (9th Cir. 1989). · cites it 2× “Under 42 U.S.C. § 502 (a) (Supp. IV 1986), the federal government provides funds for “the proper and efficient administration” of state unemployment insurance laws.”
Potomac Passengers Ass'n v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., a Corp., 520 F.2d 91 (D.C. Cir. 1975). “” 42 U.S.C. § 502 (5). . 45 U.S.C. § 561 . .”
Carney v. Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers Local Union 98 Pension Fund, 66 F. App'x 381 (3rd Cir. 2003). “Carney thereafter filed a motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 502 (g)(1), which, as noted above, was granted by the District Court in an order filed August 14, 2002.”
Brown v. Porcher, 502 F. Supp. 946 (D.S.C. 1980). “” 42 U.S.C. § 502 (a)(1). In that action, the court allowed an individual claimant injured by California’s practices to seek judicial redress under the federal funding statutes.”
Show all 32 citing cases →
— 42 U.S.C. § 502(a) — 1 case
United States v. Facchini, 874 F.2d 638 (9th Cir. 1989). “Under 42 U.S.C. § 502 (a) (Supp. IV 1986), the federal government provides funds for “the proper and efficient administration” of state unemployment insurance laws.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.