42 U.S.C. § 5058
Eligibility for other benefits
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no payment for supportive services or reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses made to persons serving pursuant to subchapter II of this chapter shall be subject to any tax or charge or be treated as wages or compensation for the purposes of unemployment, temporary disability, retirement, public assistance, workers’ compensation, or similar benefit payments, or minimum wage laws. This section shall become effective with respect to all payments made after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1985–2004 · leading case: Cmty. Action Prog. of Evansville v. Veeck, 756 N.E.2d 1079 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001).
Cmty. Action Prog. of Evansville v. Veeck, 756 N.E.2d 1079 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001). “First, 42 U.S.C.A. § 5058 provides: Notwithstanding any other provision of law no payment for supportive services or reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses made to persons serving pursuant to subchapter II of this chapter shall be subject to any tax or charge or be treated as…”
Murray State Coll. v. Akins, 794 P.2d 1218 (Okla. Civ. App. 1990). “42 U.S.C. § 5058 (1984) provides: Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no payment for supportive services or reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses made to persons serving pursuant to title II of this Act [42 USCS §§ 5001 et seq.”
Anderson v. Homeless & Hous. Coa, 135 S.W.3d 405 (Ky. 2004). “Ohio 1985), that the preemption doctrine precluded Ohio from deeming participants in the Foster Grandparent Program employees for purposes of Ohio’s Workers’ Compensation Act in direct conflict with a provision of the Domestic Volunteer Services Act, 42 U.S.C. § 5058 , which…”
United States v. Connors, 634 F. Supp. 484 (S.D. Ohio 1985). “§ 5044 (a) states that the Director is to assure that the “services of volunteers assigned, referred, or serving pursuant to grants, contracts, or agreements” are “limited to activities which would not otherwise be performed by employed workers and which will not supplant the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.