42 U.S.C. § 5602

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
National Juvenile Law Center, Inc. v. Alfred S. Regnery, Acting Administrator, Office of Juvenile Justice (1984) cadc · cites it 2× “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 5602 (b), 5634(a). Any party receiving OJJDP grants should have realized that the agency would from time to time alter its views as to how to advance those goals most effectively with the necessarily limited resources at its disposal.”
Horn ex rel. Parks v. Madison County Fiscal Court (1994) ca6 · cites it 3× “” 42 U.S.C. § 5602 (a)(8). The Act purports to serve this purpose by providing necessary resources to, inter alia, “increase the capacity of State and local governments and public and private agencies to conduct effective juvenile justice and delinquency prevention and…”
Grenier Ex Rel. Grenier v. Kennebec County (1990) med “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 5602 , 5633. 8 . The plaintiff argues that the State of Maine waived its immunity to suit in a § 1983 action because it has defined itself a “person” in its constitution and various statutes.”
Commonwealth v. Florence F. (1999) mass “” 7 42 U.S.C. § 5602 (b)(2) (1998). The enactment of the CHINS statute signified a switch from criminalizing truancy and children in need of services to providing protective care for children.”
Grenier Ex Rel. Grenier v. Kennebec County (1990) med “42 U.S.C. § 5602 (b). See also Cruz v. Collazo, 84 F.”
James v. Jones (1993) kywd “42 U.S.C. § 5602 (a)(5). Congress also hoped “to assist State and local governments in removing juveniles from jails and lockups for adults.”
FORD BY FORD v. Sully (1991) ksd “See generally Juvenile Justice and Delinquent Prevention Act, 42 U.S.C. § 5602 (b)(2) (policy of Congress is to provide resources for critically needed alternatives to juvenile institutionalization such as delinquency prevention and rehabilitation programs); Kansas Juvenile…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.