42 U.S.C. § 5771
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1987–2018 · leading case: United States v. Ackerman, 831 F.3d 1292 (10th Cir. 2016).
United States v. Ackerman, 831 F.3d 1292 (10th Cir. 2016). “, 42 U.S.C. § 5771 ; National Center for Missing & Exploited Children: Our Work, NCMEC, http://www.”
State v. Sisson, 883 A.2d 868 (Del. Super. Ct. 2005). “es in the prevention, investigation, prosecution, and treatment of cases involving missing and exploited children; assists the United States Department of State in certain cases of international child abduction in accordance with the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of…”
United States v. Keith, 980 F. Supp. 2d 33 (D. Mass. 2013). “42 U.S.C. § 5771 . To support this work of the Center, Congress has mandated funding for the Center by means of annual grants administered through the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention of the Department of Justice.”
Am. Ass'n for Lost Child. v. Westmoreland Cnty. Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 977 A.2d 595 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2009). “" 42 U.S.C. § 5771 (9)(A)-(B) (emphasis added).”
James v. State, 717 S.E.2d 713 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011). “” 42 USC § 5771 (9) (A), (C). Electronic communication service providers and remote computing service providers, who have knowledge of certain crimes involving child pornography, are required to report the facts or circumstances of the apparent crime to the NCMEC’s Cyber Tip…”
State of Washington v. Jay Karl Friedrich, 425 P.3d 518 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “42 U.S.C. §§ 5771 , 5773(b). Providers who fail to comply with the reporting obligation face substantial penalties.”
United States v. Lundquist, 731 F.3d 124 (2d Cir. 2013). “2125 (1984) (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 5771 -80a). 4 .It is unclear exactly when the government notified Amy about Lundquist, but the district court found that this occurred sometime between March 5, 2010, when Lundquist was arrested, and at the latest April 14, 2011,…”
Perkins v. Perkins, 134 A.D.2d 416 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987). “Finally, the petitioner, as a noncustodial parent, is not entitled to assistance in locating the child from the various agencies established under the Missing Children’s Assistance Act because he is not a member of the class of persons which this legislation is intended to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.