42 U.S.C. § 6023
Repealed. Pub. L. 103–230, title II, § 204, Apr. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 302
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1987–1993 · leading case: Nicoletti v. Brown, 740 F. Supp. 1268 (N.D. Ohio 1987).
Nicoletti v. Brown, 740 F. Supp. 1268 (N.D. Ohio 1987). “The specific rights claimed by the plaintiffs under the Disabled Assistance Act are found in 42 U.S.C. §§ 6023 and 6042 which provide as follows: § 6023.”
Martin v. Voinovich, 840 F. Supp. 1175 (S.D. Ohio 1993). “) Requirements for a habilitation plan are set forth in the Developmental Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6023 . 8 . Kathy R. functions both intellectually and adaptively within the moderate range of mental retardation.”
Mihalcik v. Lensink, 732 F. Supp. 299 (D. Conn. 1990). “Plaintiffs allege violations of Section 123(a) of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6023 (a), and their Fourteenth Amendment rights to substantive due process and equal protection.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.