42 U.S.C. § 6023

Repealed. Pub. L. 103–230, title II, § 204, Apr. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 302

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1987–1993 · leading case: Nicoletti v. Brown, 740 F. Supp. 1268 (N.D. Ohio 1987).
Nicoletti v. Brown, 740 F. Supp. 1268 (N.D. Ohio 1987). · cites it 4× “The specific rights claimed by the plaintiffs under the Disabled Assistance Act are found in 42 U.S.C. §§ 6023 and 6042 which provide as follows: § 6023.”
Martin v. Voinovich, 840 F. Supp. 1175 (S.D. Ohio 1993). “) Requirements for a habilitation plan are set forth in the Developmental Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6023 . 8 . Kathy R. functions both intellectually and adaptively within the moderate range of mental retardation.”
Mihalcik v. Lensink, 732 F. Supp. 299 (D. Conn. 1990). · cites it 3× “Plaintiffs allege violations of Section 123(a) of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6023 (a), and their Fourteenth Amendment rights to substantive due process and equal protection.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.