Notes of Decisions
Parks Hiway Enter., LLC v. CEM Leasing, Inc., 995 P.2d 657 (Alaska 2000).
· cites it 3× “61 Third, 42 U.S.C. § 6991a(5) merely requires Petroleum Sales to inform Gold Hill of the station’s tank notification requirements under federal law; 62 it does not obligate suppliers to verily the integrity of the tank itself.”
First of Am. Trust Co. v. Armstead, 664 N.E.2d 36 (Ill. 1996).
“See 42 U.S.C. § 6991a(a)(2)(A) (1988) ("The owner of a tank taken out of operation on or before January 1, 1974, shall not be required to notify the State or local agency under this subsection”).”
Andritz Sprout-Bauer, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc., 174 F.R.D. 609 (M.D. Penn. 1997).
“§ 6972 (a)(1)(B) (Count III); 3) sections 9001-9003 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 6991a, 6991b and 6991c and for declaratory relief under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.”
Edison Elec. Inst. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 2 F.3d 438 (D.C. Cir. 1993).
“In particular, Subchapter I requires EPA to collect detailed data on USTs, see 42 U.S.C. § 6991a, and to implement standards for UST leak detection systems, leak reporting, and corrective actions including tank shutdowns and the relocation of threatened populations.”
Dennistarr Env't, Inc. v. Indiana Dept. of Env't Mgmt., 741 N.E.2d 1284 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001).
“See 42 U.S.C. § 6991a(a)(l). As a result, the trial court properly upheld the ALJ’s determination that the tank fees were not paid in accordance with the statutory requirements.”
Andritz Sprout-Bauer, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc., 12 F. Supp. 2d 391 (M.D. Penn. 1998).
“§ 6972 (a)(1)(B) (Count III); 3) sections 9001-9003 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 6991a, 6991b and 6991c, for alleged liability as continuing owners of USTs at the Mun-cy site last used on or before November 8, 1984 and, therefore, for statutory purposes, still owned by Beazer, and for…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 6991a(5) — 1 case
Parks Hiway Enter., LLC v. CEM Leasing, Inc., 995 P.2d 657 (Alaska 2000).
“61 Third, 42 U.S.C. § 6991a(5) merely requires Petroleum Sales to inform Gold Hill of the station’s tank notification requirements under federal law; 62 it does not obligate suppliers to verily the integrity of the tank itself.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 6991a(a) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 6991a(a)(2)(A) — 1 case
First of Am. Trust Co. v. Armstead, 664 N.E.2d 36 (Ill. 1996).
“See 42 U.S.C. § 6991a(a)(2)(A) (1988) ("The owner of a tank taken out of operation on or before January 1, 1974, shall not be required to notify the State or local agency under this subsection”).”
— 42 U.S.C. § 6991a(a)(5) — 1 case
Parks Hiway Enter., LLC v. CEM Leasing, Inc., 995 P.2d 657 (Alaska 2000).
“61 Third, 42 U.S.C. § 6991a(5) merely requires Petroleum Sales to inform Gold Hill of the station’s tank notification requirements under federal law; 62 it does not obligate suppliers to verily the integrity of the tank itself.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 6991a(a)(l) — 1 case
Dennistarr Env't, Inc. v. Indiana Dept. of Env't Mgmt., 741 N.E.2d 1284 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001).
“See 42 U.S.C. § 6991a(a)(l). As a result, the trial court properly upheld the ALJ’s determination that the tank fees were not paid in accordance with the statutory requirements.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.