42 U.S.C. § 6991g
State authority
Nothing in this subchapter shall preclude or deny any right of any State or political subdivision thereof to adopt or enforce any regulation, requirement, or standard of performance respecting underground storage tanks that is more stringent than a regulation, requirement, or standard of performance in effect under this subchapter or to impose any additional liability with respect to the release of regulated substances within such State or political subdivision.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1995–2000 · leading case: Agric. Excess & Surplus Ins. v. A.B.D. Tank & Pump Co., 878 F. Supp. 1091 (N.D. Ill. 1995).
Agric. Excess & Surplus Ins. v. A.B.D. Tank & Pump Co., 878 F. Supp. 1091 (N.D. Ill. 1995). “1993 WL 524808 at * 3 (citing 42 U.S.C. § 6991g). However, Subchapter IX contains no provision establishing that Subchapter IX is the exclusive remedy for leaks from underground storage tanks.”
Boyes v. Shell Oil Prods. Co., 199 F.3d 1260 (11th Cir. 2000). “See 42 U.S.C. § 6991g. Section 376.308(5) of the Florida Statutes, however, is not saved from federal preemption by the RCRA’s savings clause.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.