43 U.S.C. § 1718

Documents of conveyance; terms, covenants, etc.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 43 CasesGoogle Scholar

The Secretary shall issue all patents or other documents of conveyance after any disposal authorized by this Act. The Secretary shall insert in any such patent or other document of conveyance he issues, except in the case of land exchanges, for which the provisions of subsection 1716(b) of this title shall apply, such terms, covenants, conditions, and reservations as he deems necessary to insure proper land use and protection of the public interest: Provided, That a conveyance of lands by the Secretary, subject to such terms, covenants, conditions, and reservations, shall not exempt the grantee from compliance with applicable Federal or State law or State land use plans: Provided further, That the Secretary shall not make conveyances of public lands containing terms and conditions which would, at the time of the conveyance, constitute a violation of any law or regulation pursuant to State and local land use plans, or programs.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1989–2016 · leading case: Silver State Land, LLC v. Janice Schneider, 843 F.3d 982 (D.C. Cir. 2016).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Silver State Land, LLC v. Janice Schneider, 843 F.3d 982 (D.C. Cir. 2016). · cites it 3× “Appellant cites 43 U.S.C. § 1718 , which requires that “[t]he Secretary shall issue all patents .”

Lodge Tower Condo. Ass'n v. Lodge Props., Inc., 880 F. Supp. 1370 (D. Colo. 1995). · cites it 2× “In their eighth “claim for relief,” plaintiffs argue that the issuance of the land patent for the lodge parcel violated 43 U.S.C.A. § 1718 (1986), which discusses the issuance of patents by the Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior.”

Silver State Land, LLC v. Schneider, 145 F. Supp. 3d 113 (D.D.C. 2015). · cites it 3× “at 13; second, under § 208 of the FLPMA, 43 U.S.C. § 1718 , the agency had a “ministerial duty to deliver the patent” once the plaintiffs offer was accepted, id.”

Est. of Dunaway v. United States, 18 Cl. Ct. 492 (Ct. Cl. 1989). “43 U.S.C. § 1718 (1976); 43 C.F.R. §§ 2200.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.