43 U.S.C. § 617g
Colorado River compact as controlling authority in construction and maintenance of dam, reservoir, canals, and other works
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1977–2022 · leading case: Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. East Bay Mun. Util. Dist., 572 P.2d 1128 (Cal. 1977).
Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. East Bay Mun. Util. Dist., 572 P.2d 1128 (Cal. 1977). “This argument was predicated on section 18 of the Boulder Canyon Project Act (43 U.S.C. § 617g) and section 8 of the Reclamation Act of 1902.”
Navajo Nation v. Usdoi, 996 F.3d 623 (9th Cir. 2021). “43 U.S.C. § 617g(a). But within the general allocation of water that the 1922 Compact entails, the Secretary has pervasive authority “both to carry out the allocation of the waters of the main Colorado River among the Lower Basin NAVAJO NATION V.”
United States v. Imperial Irrigation Dist., 559 F.2d 509 (9th Cir. 1977). “However, Section 8(b), 43 U.S.C. § 617g(b), appears to include delivery and use of water within the activities of construction, operation, and management.”
Navajo Nation v. Usdoi (9th Cir. 2022). “43 U.S.C. § 617g(a). But within the general allocation of water that the 1922 Compact entails, the Secretary has pervasive authority “both to carry out the allocation of the waters of the main Colorado River among the Lower Basin States and to decide which users within each…”
— 43 U.S.C. § 617g(a) — 2 cases
Navajo Nation v. Usdoi, 996 F.3d 623 (9th Cir. 2021). “43 U.S.C. § 617g(a). But within the general allocation of water that the 1922 Compact entails, the Secretary has pervasive authority “both to carry out the allocation of the waters of the main Colorado River among the Lower Basin NAVAJO NATION V.”
Navajo Nation v. Usdoi (9th Cir. 2022). “43 U.S.C. § 617g(a). But within the general allocation of water that the 1922 Compact entails, the Secretary has pervasive authority “both to carry out the allocation of the waters of the main Colorado River among the Lower Basin States and to decide which users within each…”
— 43 U.S.C. § 617g(b) — 2 cases
Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. East Bay Mun. Util. Dist., 572 P.2d 1128 (Cal. 1977). “This argument was predicated on section 18 of the Boulder Canyon Project Act (43 U.S.C. § 617g) and section 8 of the Reclamation Act of 1902.”
United States v. Imperial Irrigation Dist., 559 F.2d 509 (9th Cir. 1977). “However, Section 8(b), 43 U.S.C. § 617g(b), appears to include delivery and use of water within the activities of construction, operation, and management.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.