44 U.S.C. § 3517
Consultation with other agencies and the public
A prior section 3517, added Pub. L. 96–511, § 2(a),
2000—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 106–398 substituted “subchapter” for “chapter” in introductory provisions.
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–398 effective 30 days after
Section effective
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1987–2025 · leading case: Gilbert Hyatt v. Off. of Mgt. & Budget, 908 F.3d 1165 (9th Cir. 2018).
Gilbert Hyatt v. Off. of Mgt. & Budget, 908 F.3d 1165 (9th Cir. 2018). “44 U.S.C. § 3517 (b). Where such a petition does not challenge an OMB decision “to approve or not act upon a collection of information contained in an agency rule,” see 44 U.”
United to Protect Democracy v. Presidential Advisory Comm'n on Election Integrity, 288 F. Supp. 3d 99 (D.C. Cir. 2017). “Under 44 U.S.C. § 3517 (b), "[a]ny person may request the Director [of OMB] to review any collection of information conducted by or for an agency to determine, if, under [the PRA], a person shall maintain, provide, or disclose the information to or for the agency.”
Pedro Perez Perez v. Chad Wolf, 943 F.3d 853 (9th Cir. 2019). “” 44 U.S.C. § 3517 (b). We held that the first PEREZ PEREZ V.”
Ass'n of Immigr. Attorneys v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 675 F. Supp. 781 (S.D.N.Y. 1987). “§ 553 (c), and the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. § 3517 . The government seeks summary judgment.”
Hyatt v. Off. of Mgmt. & Budget (D. Nev. 2020). “§ 3517 (b) 6 “permits ‘any person’ to ‘request the [OMB] Director to review any collection of information 7 conducted by or for an agency to determine, if, under this subchapter, a person shall maintain, 8 provide, or disclose the information to or for the agency.”
United to Protect Democracy v. Presidential Advisory Comm'n on Election Integrity (D.D.C. 2017). “” 44 U.S.C. § 3517 (b). On July 3, 2017, Plaintiff United to Protect Democracy allegedly sent a letter to the Director of OMB explaining the ways in which the 5 Commission had allegedly violated the PRA’s procedural requirements and, pursuant to § 3517, requested that the…”
Pedro Perez Perez v. Chad Wolf (9th Cir. 2019). “” 44 U.S.C. § 3517 (b). We held that the first PEREZ PEREZ V.”
Gilbert Hyatt v. Omb (9th Cir. 2021). “44 U.S.C. § 3517 (b). OMB must respond to any non-frivolous request, id.”
Adam Steele v. United States (D.C. Cir. 2025). “That criticism might support a petition under 44 U.S.C. § 3517 (b), which authorizes challenges to unnecessary or unduly burdensome collections.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.