U.S. Code » Title 45 » Chapter CHAPTER 9— RETIREMENT OF RAILROAD EMPLOYEES › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER IV— RAILROAD RETIREMENT ACT OF 1974

45 U.S.C. § 231l

Penalties

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 45 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Any person who shall knowingly fail or refuse to make any report or furnish any information required by the Board in the administration of this subchapter, including the provisions of section 231f(b)(2) of this title or who shall knowingly make or cause to be made any false or fraudulent statement or report when a statement or report is required to be made for the purpose of this subchapter, or who shall knowingly make or aid in making any false or fraudulent statement or claim for the purpose of causing an award or payment to be made, shall be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 or by imprisonment not exceeding one year, or both.(b) All fines and penalties imposed by a court pursuant to this subchapter shall be paid to the court and be remitted from time to time by order of the judge to the Treasury of the United States to be credited to the Railroad Retirement Account.(Aug. 29, 1935, ch. 812, § 13, as restated June 24, 1937, ch. 382, pt. I, 50 Stat. 307, as restated Pub. L. 93–445, title I, § 101, Oct. 16, 1974, 88 Stat. 1345.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1992–1992 · leading case: Livingston Rebuild Ctr., Inc. v. R.R. Ret. Bd., 970 F.2d 295 (7th Cir. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Livingston Rebuild Ctr., Inc. v. R.R. Ret. Bd., 970 F.2d 295 (7th Cir. 1992). “45 U.S.C. §§ 231l(a), 359(a). Taken in conjunction with §§ 231h, 356, the Board’s decision that the Center is an “employer” requires it to report its workers’ pay, and the risk of penalty for noncompliance permits immediate judicial review.”
— 45 U.S.C. § 231l(a) — 1 case
Livingston Rebuild Ctr., Inc. v. R.R. Ret. Bd., 970 F.2d 295 (7th Cir. 1992). “45 U.S.C. §§ 231l(a), 359(a). Taken in conjunction with §§ 231h, 356, the Board’s decision that the Center is an “employer” requires it to report its workers’ pay, and the risk of penalty for noncompliance permits immediate judicial review.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.