47 U.S.C. § 333
Willful or malicious interference
No person shall willfully or maliciously interfere with or cause interference to any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under this chapter or operated by the United States Government.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case: Robert Johnson v. Am. Towers, LLC, 781 F.3d 693 (4th Cir. 2015).
Robert Johnson v. Am. Towers, LLC, 781 F.3d 693 (4th Cir. 2015). “” 47 U.S.C. § 333 . The Defendants argue that “no person” includes first parties and therefore prohibits self-interference.”
United States v. Gerritsen, 571 F.3d 1001 (9th Cir. 2009). “§ 1362 (providing a maximum sentence of ten years); (2) two counts of malicious interference with a licensed or authorized radio communication under 47 U.S.C. § 333 ; and (3) three counts of transmitting without a license under 47 U.”
Fetterman v. Green, 689 A.2d 289 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1997). “Therefore, we must begin our analysis with a careful reading and interpretation of 47 U.S.C. § 333 , which states: § 333. Willful or malicious interference No person shall willfully or maliciously interfere with or cause interference to any radio communications of any station…”
United States v. Baxter, 841 F. Supp. 2d 378 (D. Me. 2012). “101 (d); see also 47 U.S.C. § 333 . The forfeiture amount for intentional interference with another transmission is $7,000.”
Monport v. Larson, 258 A.D.2d 261 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999). “Furthermore, the FCA states that “[n]o person shall willfully or maliciously interfere with or cause interference to any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under this chapter or operated by the United States Government” ( 47 USC § 333 ). It is…”
Monfort v. Larson, 257 A.D.2d 261 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999). “Furthermore, the FCA states that “[n]o person shall willfully or maliciously interfere with or cause interference to any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under this chapter or operated by the United States Government” ( 47 USC § 333 ). It is…”
Radar Solutions, Ltd. v. United States Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 368 F. App'x 480 (5th Cir. 2010). “47 U.S.C. § 333 . 10 . See R. at 90-91. 11 .”
Bloosurf, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. (D. Maryland 2025). “) Therein, Bloosurf alleges willful and wanton interference in violation of 47 U.S.C. § 333 against T-Mobile and TDI (id.”
Bloosurf, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. (4th Cir. 2026). “The district court correctly dismissed Count 1, which asserts that T-Mobile violated 47 U.S.C. § 333 . In the district court’s view, that claim failed because Bloosurf lacks a private right of action to enforce that provision.”
Radar Solutions, Ltd. v. United States Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 628 F. Supp. 2d 714 (W.D. Tex. 2009). “” 47 U.S.C. § 333 . Police radar uses a narrowly defined portion of the radio spectrum.”
United States v. Gerritsen (9th Cir. 2009). “§ 1362 (providing a maximum sentence of ten years); (2) two counts of malicious interference with a licensed or authorized radio communica- tion under 47 U.S.C. § 333 ; and (3) three counts of transmit- ting without a license under 47 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.