48 U.S.C. § 226
“The Governments of the Marshall Islands and the Federated States of Micronesia may request, from time to time, technical assistance from the federal agencies and institutions of the Government of the United States, which are authorized to grant such technical assistance in accordance with its laws and which shall grant such technical assistance in a manner which gives priority consideration to the Marshall Islands and the Federated States of Micronesia over other recipients not a part of the United States, its territories or possessions. The Government of the United States shall coordinate the provision of such technical assistance in consultation with the respective recipient Government.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1925–1987 · leading case: Hynes, Reg'l Dir., Fish & Wildlife Serv. v. Grimes Packing Co., 337 U.S. 86 (1949).
Hynes, Reg'l Dir., Fish & Wildlife Serv. v. Grimes Packing Co., 337 U.S. 86 (1949). “466 , 48 U.S.C. § 226 . [16] Parker v. Brown, supra, 349 .”
Constantine v. State, 739 P.2d 188 (Alaska Ct. App. 1987). “720 was 48 U.S.C. § 226 (1952) (§ 39-2-10 ACLA (1949)), which provided in relevant part: Any person, company, corporation or association violating any provisions of sections 221-228 or 230-241 [statutes regulating commercial fishing in the territory of Alaska] of this title, or…”
Johnson v. United States, 206 F.2d 806 (9th Cir. 1953). “The requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act were *810 fully complied with. We conclude that Regulation 102.”
Hynes v. Grimes Packing Co., 165 F.2d 323 (9th Cir. 1947). “nd that appellant, as Regional Director of the Fish and Wildlife Service of the Department of the Interior, had threatened to seize the appellees’ fishing boats and catches of salmon and to arrest their fishermen, some six hundred in number, in the manner prohibited by the…”
Ketchikan Packing Co. v. Fred A. Seaton, Sec'y of the Interior, 267 F.2d 660 (D.C. Cir. 1959). “authority to limit fishing in any areas so set apart and reserved the Secretary may (a) fix the size and character of nets, boats, traps, or other gear and appliances to be used therein; (b) limit the catch of fish to be taken from any area; (c) make such regulations as to time,…”
Thomas B. Rustad, Harvey R. Wyborny, Homer C. Skelley, Charles Diven & James Johnson v. United States, 258 F.2d 563 (9th Cir. 1958). “48 U.S.C.A. § 226 2 provides for fine and imprisonment for any such violation, i.”
Paul v. United States, 36 F.2d 639 (9th Cir. 1929). “464 [ 48 U.S.C.A. § 226 ]). After the imposition of the'fine, the appellant, an attorney at law living at Ketchikan, Alaska, was employed by Dalton through the agency of one Peratovich, the owner of the boat of which Dalton was master, used at the time of the alleged violation…”
United States v. One Floating Fish Trap, 7 Alaska 334 (D. Alaska 1925). “” By section 6 of the Act of June 6, 1924 (48 USCA § 226 [U. S. Comp. St. § 362214c]), it is provided that, in addition to the penalties of fine and imprisonment for violation of the act: “Every boat, seine, net, trap, and every other gear and appliance used or employed in…”
The M. & M., 8 Alaska 17 (D. Alaska 1928). “464 , 466 ( 48 U.S.C.A. §§ 226 , 227), entitled, “An Act For the protection of the fisheries of Alaska, and for other purposes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.