48 U.S.C. § 24
[Coast and Geodetic Survey.]
The first sentence of section 1 of the Act of August 3, 1956 (70 Stat. 988), is amended by striking out the words ‘the several States’ and inserting in lieu thereof the words ‘the States of the continental United States, excluding Alaska.’
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1923–1961 · leading case: Metlakatla Indian Com., Annette Island Res. v. Egan, 362 P.2d 901 (Alaska 1961).
Metlakatla Indian Com., Annette Island Res. v. Egan, 362 P.2d 901 (Alaska 1961). “From 1936 onward the total pack gradually decreased to 1,778,339 cases in 1959, the lowest in the history of the industry.”
Anderson v. Mullaney, Comm'r of Taxation of Territory of Alaska, 191 F.2d 123 (9th Cir. 1951). “We find in the record no facts which would operate to sustain the discrimination here effected. The trial court found that it could be upheld on account of the additional costs of enforcing the Act and collecting the tax in respect to the nonresident fishermen.”
Rogge v. United States, 128 F.2d 800 (9th Cir. 1942). “3, 48 U.S.C.A. § 24 ; sec. 464 C.L.A.1933. Appellants contend that the Act is invalid because it delegates legislative power to an administrative official without prescribing a standard for fixing the amount of the toll.”
Territory of Alaska v. Arctic Maid, 140 F. Supp. 190 (D. Alaska 1956). “” *194 (2) That' the fish taken by them are so taken partly in and partly outside of the three-mile limit and frozen aboard the vessel to preserve them for transportation to the State of Washington for canning, and that therefore their activities are beyond the taxing…”
Martinsen v. Mullaney, 85 F. Supp. 76 (D. Alaska 1949). “512 , 48 U.S.C.A. § 24 , from regulating the fisheries.”
P. E. Harris & Co. v. Mullaney, 87 F. Supp. 248 (D. Alaska 1949). “512 , 48 U.S.C.A. § 24 , provides that: “The authority granted to the legislature by section 23 of this title to alter, amend, modify, and repeal laws in force in Alaska shall not extend to the customs, internal revenue, postal, or other general laws of the United States or to…”
Anderson v. Smith, 71 F.2d 493 (9th Cir. 1934). “§ 24 ), which provides as follows: “Provided, That the authority herein granted to the legislature to alter, amend, modify, and repeal laws in force in Alaska shall not *736 extend to * * * the game, fish, and fur-seal laws and .”
Territory of Alaska v. Annette Island Packing Co., 289 F. 671 (9th Cir. 1923). “The plaintiff in error contends that like power of taxation has been by Congress vested in the territorial Legislature of Alaska, and cites section 410, Compiled Laws of Alaska of 1913, and section 3 of the Organic Act of the Territory ( 48 U.S.C.A. § 24 ), which in granting…”
Gordon v. Nash, 9 Alaska 701 (D. Alaska 1940). “* * *” 48 U.S.C.A. § 24 , section 464, C.L.A.1933.”
Anderson v. Smith, 8 Alaska 470 (D. Alaska 1934). “512), provides inter alia that the Legislature shall have no power to alter, amend, or repeal the fish laws, but it is, in section 3 thereof ( 48 U.S.C.A. § 24 ), *481 further provided that “This provision shall not operate to prevent the legislature from imposing other and…”
Freeman v. Smith, 62 F.2d 291 (9th Cir. 1932). “512 [ 48 U.S.C.A. § 24 ]), as we have seen, prohibited the territorial Legislature from later altering, amending, or modifying or repealing laws relating to game and fishing in Alaska.”
Freeman v. Smith, 8 Alaska 229 (D. Alaska 1930). “ls of the United States applicable to Alaska, or to the laws of the United States providing for taxes on business and trade, or to the Act entitled ‘An Act to provide for the construction and maintenance of roads, the establishment and maintenance of schools, and the care and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.