48 U.S.C. § 243
“Articles imported from Palau which are not exempt from any duty under paragraphs (a), (b), (c) and (d) of Section 242 shall be subject to the rates of duty set forth in column numbered 1 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States and all products of the United States imported into Palau shall receive treatment no less favorable than that accorded like products of any foreign country with respect to customs duties or charges of a similar nature and with respect to laws and regulations relating to importation, exportation, taxation, sale, distribution, storage, or use.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1930–1961 · leading case: Metlakatla Indian Com., Annette Island Res. v. Egan, 362 P.2d 901 (Alaska 1961).
Metlakatla Indian Com., Annette Island Res. v. Egan, 362 P.2d 901 (Alaska 1961). “263 , 48 U.S.C.A. § 243 . 131 . See United States v.”
Freeman v. Smith, 8 Alaska 229 (D. Alaska 1930). “Whether an act of the territorial Legislature aimed to assist in conservation of fish would, from that fact alone, be beyond the power of the Legislature need not be determined in this case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.