48 U.S.C. § 407

STUDY OF TAX PROVISIONS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 48 CasesGoogle Scholar

“The Secretary of the Treasury or his delegate—“(1) shall conduct a study of the effects of the tax provisions of the Compact (as clarified by the foregoing provisions of this title), and“(2) shall report the results of such study before October 1, 1987, to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate.

[The due date for the report referred to in section 407 of Pub. L. 99–239, set out above, was extended to Jan. 1, 1991 by Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, § 11831(b), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–559.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1988–2010 · leading case: Frazier v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A., 702 F. Supp. 1000 (W.D.N.Y. 1988).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Frazier v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A., 702 F. Supp. 1000 (W.D.N.Y. 1988). “The State has submitted an affidavit in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and in defense of the constitutionality of § 9-g of the New York Banking Law, which supports Marine’s position that no conflict between state and federal law, and thus no Supremacy…”

In Re Schena, 439 B.R. 776 (Bankr. D.N.M. 2010). “Therefore, this Court finds that where debtors have elected to use the exemptions specified in § 522(d) they are precluded from invoking federal non-bankruptcy exemptions, except where non-Title 11 law explicitly provides for protection of debtors in bankruptcy.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.