49 U.S.C. § 10304

VEHICLE BACKOVER AVOIDANCE TECHNOLOGY STUDY.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 49 CasesGoogle Scholar

“(a)In General.—The Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration shall conduct a study of effective methods for reducing the incidence of injury and death outside of parked passenger motor vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating of not more than 10,000 pounds attributable to movement of such vehicles. The Administrator shall complete the study within 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Aug. 10, 2005] and report its findings to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce not later than 15 months after the date of enactment of this Act.“(b)Specific Issues To Be Covered.—The study required by subsection (a) shall—“(1) include an analysis of backover prevention technology;“(2) identify, evaluate, and compare the available technologies for detecting people or objects behind a motor vehicle with a gross vehicle weight rating of not more than 10,000 pounds for their accuracy, effectiveness, cost, and feasibility for installation; and“(3) provide an estimate of cost savings that would result from widespread use of backover prevention devices and technologies in motor vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating of not more than 10,000 pounds, including savings attributable to the prevention of—“(A) injuries and fatalities; and“(B) damage to bumpers and other motor vehicle parts and damage to other objects.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1982–1982 · leading case: Steere Tank Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n & United States of Am., 675 F.2d 763 (5th Cir. 1982).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Steere Tank Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n & United States of Am., 675 F.2d 763 (5th Cir. 1982). “See 49 U.S.C. § 10304 . The Commission may delegate to an employee board “a matter before the Commission for action.”

Global Van Lines, Inc. & Wheaton Van Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n & the United States of Am., 691 F.2d 773 (5th Cir. 1982). “See 49 U.S.C. §§ 10304 , 10305 (Supp. Ill 1979).”

Illinois Terminal R.R. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 671 F.2d 1214 (8th Cir. 1982). “6 (g) (1980); 49 U.S.C. §§ 10304 , 10305 (Supp. Ill 1979).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.