49 U.S.C. § 10305

NONTRAFFIC INCIDENT DATA COLLECTION.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 49 CasesGoogle Scholar

“(a)In General.—In conjunction with the study required in section 10304, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration shall establish a method to collect and maintain data on the number and types of injuries and deaths involving motor vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating of not more than 10,000 pounds in non-traffic incidents.“(b)Data Collection and Publication.—The Secretary of Transportation shall publish the data collected under subsection (a) no less frequently than biennially.”

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 9 cases, 1980–2011 · leading case: N. Plains Resource Council, Inc. v. Surface Transp. Bd., 668 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2011).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

N. Plains Resource Council, Inc. v. Surface Transp. Bd., 668 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2011). · cites it 3× “49 U.S.C. § 10305 permits the ICC to “delegate to a division, an individual Commissioner, an employee board, or an employee appointed under Section 3105 of title 5, a matter before the Commission for action.”

Cent. States Enter., Inc. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n & United States of Am., 780 F.2d 664 (7th Cir. 1986). · cites it 2× “The Review Board is comprised of three Commission employees to whom the responsibility to decide appeals from initial decisions is delegated pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 10305 (a). Any action taken by the Review Board “has the same force and is taken in the same manner as if *672…”

Ry. Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Interstate Com. Comm'n & United States of Am., 735 F.2d 691 (2d Cir. 1984). “On July 15, 1983, an employee review board of the Commission, acting under authority delegated in 49 U.S.C. § 10305 , issued a decision granting a certificate of abandonment.”

Aaacon Auto Transp., Inc. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n & United States of Am., Auto Driveaway Co., Intervenor, 792 F.2d 1156 (D.C. Cir. 1986). “49 U.S.C. § 10305 (a) (1982). This authority is, of course, cabined by the APA, which requires agencies to assign AUs in rotation to the extent “practicable.”

Port Norris Express Co., Inc. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n & United States of Am., 746 F.2d 69 (D.C. Cir. 1984). “Review Board 1 is a panel of three Commission employees delegated initial decisionmaking authority pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 10305 (a) (1982). . Appendix for Petitioner at 68-70.”

Steere Tank Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n & United States of Am., 675 F.2d 763 (5th Cir. 1982). “” 49 U.S.C. § 10305 (c). Under these circumstances, we have little difficulty in holding that the decision of the employee board, having been transformed hito a decision of the Commission by Steere’s failure to file an administrative appeal within the allotted time, see id.”

Magner-O'hara Scenic Ry., a Michigan Co-P'ship Consisting of Joel G. Magner & Joseph M. O'Hara v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 692 F.2d 441 (6th Cir. 1982). “Under 49 U.S.C. § 10305 , the Commission may delegate an initial decision to a panel of Commission employees.”

Trailways Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 766 F.2d 1537 (D.C. Cir. 1985). “49 U.S.C. § 10305 (a) (1982). . Peter Pan, Trailways, and Carolina petitioned the ICC for a stay pending judicial review, but the request was denied.”

Chicago & North W. Transp. Co. v. The United States of Am. & the Interstate Com. Comm'n, 627 F.2d 94 (7th Cir. 1980). “The statutory authority for the Commission’s delegation of this authority to the Director is derived from 49 U.S.C. § 10305 and is unchallenged. The Commission contends that the Director’s September 10 procedural decision was not subject to judicial review because an…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.