U.S. Code » Title 49 » Subtitle SUBTITLE V— RAIL PROGRAMS › Part PART C— PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION › Chapter CHAPTER 247— AMTRAK ROUTE SYSTEM

49 U.S.C. § 142

SERVICE DISCONTINUANCE.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 49 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a)Repeal.—Section 24706(c) is repealed.“(b)Existing Contracts.—Any provision of a contract entered into before the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 2, 1997] between Amtrak and a labor organization representing Amtrak employees relating to employee protective arrangements and severance benefits applicable to employees of Amtrak is extinguished, including all provisions of Appendix C–2 to the National Railroad Passenger Corporation Agreement, signed July 5, 1973.“(c)Special Effective Date.—Subsections (a) [amending this section] and (b) of this section shall take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 2, 1997].“(d)Nonapplication of Bankruptcy Law Provision.—Section 1172(c) of title 11, United States Code, shall not apply to Amtrak and its employees.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1933–1952 · leading case: Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United States, 292 U.S. 282 (1934).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United States, 292 U.S. 282 (1934). “499 ; 49 U.S.C. § 142 ) “it is declared to be the policy of Congress to promote, encourage and develop water transportation, service, and facilities in connection with the commerce of the United States, and to foster and preserve in full vigor both rail and water transportation.”
Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United States, 4 F. Supp. 745 (E.D. Mo. 1933). · cites it 2× “, title 49, § 142 [49 USCA § 142]), which is directed toward the encouragement of water transportation.”
Scandrett v. United States, 32 F. Supp. 995 (D. Or. 1940). · cites it 4× “" By § 500, 49 U.S.C.A. § 142 , it was provided in part: "It is declared to be the policy of Congress to promote, encourage, and develop water transportation, service, and facilities in connection with the commerce of the United States, and to foster and preserve in full vigor…”
Warrior River Terminal Co. v. State, 58 So. 2d 100 (Ala. 1952). “456 , § 500, 49 U.S.C.A. § 142 . Following preliminary notice, protest and hearing, the Department of Revenue of the State of Alabama made a final assessment against the Warrior -River Terminal Company on July 12, 1948, for ad valorem taxes on account of tangible property owned…”
Illinois Cent. R. v. United States, 3 F. Supp. 1005 (D. Del. 1933). “…with the commerce of the United States, and to foster and preserve in full vigor both rail and water transportation.” 49 USCA § 142, 41 Stat. 499 .”
Sonken-Galamba Corp. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 29 F. Supp. 796 (N.D. Tex. 1939). “Unrestricted choice was conferred upon the Labor Board by the section of Transportation Act 1920, here involved (Section 310 [ 49 U.S.C.A. § 142 ]). So far as venue is concerned, there is no ambiguity in the words ‘any United States District Court The Court further said: “We are…”
Baltimore & O. R. v. United States, 65 F. Supp. 962 (W.D. Pa. 1946). “” 49 U.S.C.A. § 142 . Section 3(1) provides, in part: “It shall be unlawful for any common carrier * * * [to] cause any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage * * *; or to subject any [person, locality or type of traffic] to any undue or unreasonable prejudice or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.