U.S. Code » Title 49 » Subtitle SUBTITLE VII— AVIATION PROGRAMS › Part PART A— AIR COMMERCE AND SAFETY › Subpart subpart iii— safety › Chapter CHAPTER 448— UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS

49 U.S.C. § 2201

DEFINITIONS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 49 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a)Definitions Applied.—In this subtitle, the terms ‘unmanned aircraft’, ‘unmanned aircraft system’, and ‘small unmanned aircraft’ have the meanings given those terms in section 331 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 [Pub. L. 112–95] (49 U.S.C. 40101 note [now 49 U.S.C. 44802 note]), as amended by this Act.“(b)FAA Modernization and Reform Act.—

[Amended section 331 of Pub. L. 112–95, set out in a note below.]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1983–2005 · leading case: Suburban O'Hare Comm'n v. Elizabeth Hanford Dole, Sec'y of the Dep't of Transp., 787 F.2d 186 (7th Cir. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Suburban O'Hare Comm'n v. Elizabeth Hanford Dole, Sec'y of the Dep't of Transp., 787 F.2d 186 (7th Cir. 1986). “This legislation was in turn replaced by the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982 (“AAIA”), 49 U.S.C. §§ 2201 et seq. (Chapter 31 of Title 49).”
United States v. Cnty. of Westchester, 571 F. Supp. 786 (S.D.N.Y. 1983). · cites it 3× “§ 1718 (emphasis added) (superseded by Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, 49 U.S.C. §§ 2201 et seq., at § 2210(a)(1) and (a)(6)).”
Nicholson Air v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners of Allegany Cnty., 706 A.2d 124 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1998). “Appellant’s *84 claims regarding its air carrier business are based on the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, 7 49 U.S.C. § 2201 et seq., which specifically prevents discrimination at airports that receive federal funds.”
Suburban O'Hare Comm'n v. Dole, 603 F. Supp. 1013 (N.D. Ill. 1985). · cites it 2× “Instead, Suburban O’Hare asserts that the “order” challenged here is the FAA’s substantive and procedural compliance with the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, 49 U.S.C. § 2201 , et seq., 8 and as such was made under Chapter 31 of Title 49.”
Interface Grp., Inc. v. Massachusetts Port Auth., 631 F. Supp. 483 (D. Mass. 1986). “49 U.S.C. § 2201 (a). The AAIA for the first time made available airport development and planning funds for “privately owned reliever airports.”
Scott Aviation, Inc. v. Dupage Airport Auth., 393 F. Supp. 2d 638 (N.D. Ill. 2005). “§ 2 (Count I), a denial of Plaintiffs’ rights under the Airport and Airway Improvement Act (“AAIA”), 49 U.S.C.A. § 2201 et seq., in violation of 42 U.”
Stop H-3 Ass'n v. Dole, 740 F.2d 1442 (9th Cir. 1984). “695 (explicitly requiring consideration of alternate forms of transportation); see also 49 U.S.C. § 2201 (b) (statement of purpose for “various modes of transportation” in airport planning); but see 49 U.”
Arrow Airways, Inc. v. Dade Cnty., 749 F.2d 1489 (11th Cir. 1985). “I The Miami International Airport participates in federal aid programs and projects under 49 U.S.C. §§ 2201 et seq., the Airport and Airway Development Act of 1982.”
New York v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 712 F.2d 806 (2d Cir. 1983). “671 (codified at 49 U.S.C. §§ 2201 et seq. (West Supp.1983)).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.