49 U.S.C. § 2501
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1986–2020 · leading case: Specialized Carriers & Rigging Assoc. v. Commonwealth of Virginia Harold C. King R.L. Suthard, 795 F.2d 1152 (4th Cir. 1986).
Specialized Carriers & Rigging Assoc. v. Commonwealth of Virginia Harold C. King R.L. Suthard, 795 F.2d 1152 (4th Cir. 1986). “49 U.S.C. § 2501 et seq. 6 . Plaintiffs Brief, p.”
Dixon v. Hot Shot Express, Inc., 44 So. 3d 1082 (Ala. 2010). “While the regulation in question was authorized by the Motor Carrier Safety Act, 49 U.S.C. § 2501 et seq., Congress made clear that the Act did not intend to completely preempt supplementary state regulation.”
Ronald Rafanello Vs. Jorge S. Taylor- Esquivel (l-3488-15 & L-1721-17, Union Cnty. & Statewide) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2020). “] Against this backdrop, our Legislature clarified: Notwithstanding any provision of law or regulation to the contrary, no person shall operate a commercial motor vehicle, as defined in rules adopted pursuant to this section, in this State unless the operation of the 7 Formerly…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.