49 U.S.C. § 402
DEFINITIONS.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24
cases, 1941–1962 · leading case: Allegheny Airlines, Inc., Civil Aeronautics Bd. & Adm'r of Civil Aeronautics, Intervenors-Appellees v. Vill. of Cedarhurst, 238 F.2d 812 (2d Cir. 1956).
Allegheny Airlines, Inc., Civil Aeronautics Bd. & Adm'r of Civil Aeronautics, Intervenors-Appellees v. Vill. of Cedarhurst, 238 F.2d 812 (2d Cir. 1956). “” 3 Section 2, 49 U.S.C.A. § 402 , directs that in exercising its powers and performing its duties under the Act, the Board shall ■consider as being in the public interest and in accordance with the public convenience and necessity “(e) The regulation of air commerce in such…”
W. R. Grace & Co. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 154 F.2d 271 (2d Cir. 1946). “" That complaint overlooks this basic assumption of our opinion: As the Board itself recognized in the recitals of its order of September 10, 1942, the declared policy of Congress set forth in § 2 of the Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 402 , not only makes paramount the "public interest" but…”
Pan Am. Airways Co. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 121 F.2d 810 (2d Cir. 1941). “The Civil Aeronautics Act contains the following declarations of policy in Section 2, Subdivisions (a) and (d), 49 U.S.C.A. § 402 (a, d): “(a) The encouragement and development of an air-transportation system properly adapted to the present and future needs of the foreign and…”
In Re Vets.' Air Express Co., 76 F. Supp. 684 (D.N.J. 1948). “” The declaration of policy stated by Congress in Séction 2 of the Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 402 , recites that among its purposes is the encouragement and development of civil aeronautics and “of an air-transportation system properly adapted to the present and future needs of the…”
City of Newark, New Jersey v. E. Airlines, Inc., 159 F. Supp. 750 (D.N.J. 1958). “” See Declaration of Policy, Section 2 of the Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 402 ; see also Section 601 of the Act, 49 U.”
Union Trust Co. of Dist. of Columbia v. United States, 113 F. Supp. 80 (D.D.C. 1953). “§ 402 (e), there follows as a matter of course the corollary responsibility to promote safety of flight, by the prescription of air traffic rules, and their revision from time to time as circumstances and conditions warrant and dictate, “ * * * for the prevention of collisions…”
Leonard J. Specht v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 254 F.2d 905 (8th Cir. 1958). “See also Sections 2 (e) and 601(b) of the Act [ 49 U.S.C.A. §§ 402 (b,e), 551(b)].) The Board, in conformance with the Congressional mandate, has demanded that pilots who sit at the controls of pássenger-carrying airliners exercise ‘thé highest degree of care,’ (Stead Airman…”
David Paul Pike v. Civil Aeronautics Bd. & Najeeb E. Halaby, Adm'r of the Fed. Aviation Agency, 303 F.2d 353 (8th Cir. 1962). “49 U.S.C.A. § 402 (b) and (e). 8 . 49 U.S.”
Hough v. Rapidair, Inc., 298 S.W.2d 378 (Mo. 1957). “Consequently, we believe the Rules promulgated by Federal authority in promoting safety in flight in Air Commerce and in developing and regulating Air Transportation, 49 U.S.C.A. §§ 402 and 551, matters of national concern, may be considered as applicable in evidencing the safe…”
United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 198 F.2d 100 (7th Cir. 1952). “2 of the Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 402 , roads: “In the exercise and performance of its powers and duties under this chapter, the Board shall consider the following, among other things, as being in the public interest, and in accordance with the public convenience and necessity— “(a)…”
Allegheny Airlines, Inc. v. Vill. of Cedarhurst, 132 F. Supp. 871 (E.D.N.Y 1955). “Section 2 of the 1938 Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 402 , prescribes the policy that the Board shall follow in the performance of its duties, including: “The regulation of air transportation in such manner as to * * * assure the highest degree of safety in * * * such transportation * * * ”…”
Nat'l Air Freight Forwarding Corp. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 197 F.2d 384 (D.C. Cir. 1952). “” Brief for Appellant, p. 26. That the Board may consider' the competitive impact of an applicant on the air transportation industry as one element of the public interest is obvious from the Act’s declaration of policy, 52 Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.