49 U.S.C. § 403
PURPOSE.
“It is the purpose of this title to provide full compensation to any individual (or relatives of a deceased individual) who was physically injured or killed as a result of the terrorist-related aircraft crashes of
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases, 1946–2003 · leading case: Gardner v. Allegheny Cnty., 114 A.2d 491 (Pa. 1955).
Gardner v. Allegheny Cnty., 114 A.2d 491 (Pa. 1955). “980 , § 3, 49 U.S.C. § 403 . "The provision pertinent to sovereignty over the navigable air space in the Air Commerce Act of 1926 was an assertion of exclusive national sovereignty.”
United States v. Causby, 328 U.S. 256 (1946). “" 49 U.S.C. § 403 . And "navigable air space" is defined as "airspace above the minimum safe altitudes of flight prescribed by the Civil Aeronautics Authority.”
Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Nebraska State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment, 347 U.S. 590 (1954). “980 , § 3, 49 U. S. C. § 403 . [9] The provision pertinent to sovereignty over the navigable air space in the Air Commerce Act of 1926 was an assertion of exclusive national sovereignty.”
Cheyenne Airport Bd. v. Rogers, 707 P.2d 717 (Wyo. 1985). “49 U.S.C. § 403 (1938); 49 U.S.C. § 1304 (1958); 49 U.”
Branning v. United States, 228 Ct. Cl. 240 (Ct. Cl. 1981). “” 49 U.S.C. § 403 (1940) (current version at 49 U.”
Breneman v. United States, 57 Fed. Cl. 571 (Fed. Cl. 2003). “(quoting 49 U.S.C. § 403 , repealed by Federal Aviation Act of 1958, Pub.”
Allegheny Airlines, Inc., Civil Aeronautics Bd. & Adm'r of Civil Aeronautics, Intervenors-Appellees v. Vill. of Cedarhurst, 238 F.2d 812 (2d Cir. 1956). “Section 3, 49 U.S.C.A. § 403 , declares “There is recognized and declared to exist in behalf of any citizen of the United States a public right of freedom of transit in air commerce through the navigable air space of the United States.”
Yoffee v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co., 123 A.2d 636 (Pa. 1956). “Section 8 of the Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938, 49 U.S.C.A. §403 , declares: “There is recognized and declared to exist in behalf of any citizen of the United States a public right of freedom of transit in air commerce through the navigable air space of the United States.”
Grace v. MacArthur, 170 F. Supp. 442 (E.D. Ark. 1959). “980 , § 3, 49 U.S.C. § 403 , 49 U.S.C.A. § 403 . “The provision pertinent to sovereignty over the navigable air space in the Air Commerce Act of 1926 was an assertion of exclusive national sovereignty.”
Town of East Haven v. E. Airlines, Inc., 331 F. Supp. 16 (D. Conn. 1971). “” The Court pointed out that although Congress has granted every citizen “a public right of freedom of transit through the navigable airspace of the United States” ( 49 U.S.C. § 403 , now § 1304), the “navigable airspace of the United States,” as then defined by statute and…”
In Re Vets.' Air Express Co., 76 F. Supp. 684 (D.N.J. 1948). “Section 3 of the Act, 49 U.S. C.A. § 403, states that “There is hereby recognized and declared to exist in behalf of any citizen of the United States a public right of freedom, of transit in air commerce through the navigable air space of the United States.”
City of Newark, New Jersey v. E. Airlines, Inc., 159 F. Supp. 750 (D.N.J. 1958). “Section 3 of the Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 403 , provides: “There is recognized and declared to exist in behalf of any citizen of the United States a public right of freedom of transit in air commerce through the navigable airspace of the United States.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.