49 U.S.C. § 601
SEPARABILITY.
“If any provision of this Act (including any amendment made by this Act [amending sections 44302 to 44306 of this title]) or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of this Act (including any amendment made by this Act) and the application thereof to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases, 1941–2019 · leading case: Chicago & S. Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 333 U.S. 103 (1948).
Chicago & S. Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 333 U.S. 103 (1948). “49 U.S.C. § 601 . *105 By proceedings not challenged as to regularity, the Board, with express approval of the President, issued an order which denied Waterman Steamship Corporation a certificate of convenience and necessity for an air route and granted one to Chicago and…”
Ctr. for Biological Diversit v. Usfs, 925 F.3d 1041 (9th Cir. 2019). “Waterman involved sections of the Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938, 49 U.S.C. §§ 601 , 646, that provided for both presidential and judicial review of an administrative order granting an application for an overseas air route.”
Am. Historical Ass'n v. Peterson, 876 F. Supp. 1300 (D.D.C. 1995). “at 433-34 (referring to section 801 of the Civil Aeronautics Act, 49 U.S.C. § 601 , which was repealed in 1958).”
Pan Am. Airways Co. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 121 F.2d 810 (2d Cir. 1941). “” But it does not follow merely from the broad language of Section 1006(a) that there may be a review of orders for the issuance of certificates which the President shall approve or disapprove under Section 801, 49 U.S.C.A. § 601 . That section provides in part that: “The…”
Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd. Sparks v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 184 F.2d 66 (2d Cir. 1950). “The *70 Board’s order protects them in these respects.”
Pan Am.-Grace Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 178 F.2d 34 (D.C. Cir. 1949). “The case was then referred to the President of the United States, pursuant to § 801 of the Civil Aeronautics Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 601 , which provides not only that the issuance of a certificate of public convenience and necessity, but also its denial, revocation, amendment, or…”
United States Overseas Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., Seaboard & W. Airlines, Inc., Intervenor, 222 F.2d 303 (D.C. Cir. 1955). “A motion to dismiss the petition was made by the Board and was denied without prejudice to renewal at the hearing on the merits. The motion was renewed at the hearing and will now be granted.”
Pac. Overseas Airlines Corp. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 161 F.2d 633 (D.C. Cir. 1946). “Pursuant to § 801 of the Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938, 49 U.S.C.A. § 601 , that order was approved by the President on June 29, 1946.”
United States v. Pan Am. World Airways, Inc., 193 F. Supp. 18 (S.D.N.Y. 1961). “It gave to the President of the United States approval and veto power for such certificates as related to “overseas” and “foreign” air transportation ( 49 U.S.C.A. § 601 ). Since, however, a number of air carriers were in operation prior to the act it provided that as to those…”
Colonial Airlines v. Adams, 87 F. Supp. 242 (D.D.C. 1950). “There seems to be no practical reason, therefore, why the Court should not enquire, at this time, into the constitutionality of the statute at issue in the controversy.”
Grace Line, Inc., & Nat'l Bulk Carriers, Inc., Intervening v. Panama Canal Co., 243 F.2d 844 (2d Cir. 1957). “” 49 U.S.C. § 601 . 33 . At the time the present statute was passed the most comparable waterway was the Suez Canal, then privately-owned.”
Pan Am. World Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 261 F.2d 754 (D.C. Cir. 1958). “1014 (1938), 49 U.S.C.A. § 601 . I. — Presidential Approval.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.