49 U.S.C. § 8
NO ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
“No additional funds are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act, and this Act shall be carried out using amounts otherwise available for such purpose.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 115
cases, 1928–2004 · leading case: Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Wichita Bd. of Trade, 412 U.S. 800 (1973).
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Wichita Bd. of Trade, 412 U.S. 800 (1973). “The Commission thus has not determined that a rate which does not exceed the current general maximum is reasonable. A shipper can challenge any such rate as unreasonable and, if he succeeds, may recover reparations.”
United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP), 412 U.S. 669 (1973). “In addition § 8 of the Act, 49 U. S. C. § 8 , creates a private right of action for damagesbased upon conduct violative of the Actwhich might be available .”
Miller v. Aaacon Auto Transp., Inc., 447 F. Supp. 1201 (S.D. Fla. 1978). “1976) and 49 U.S.C. § 8 . The court would agree with the reasoning set forth in the Hubbard case that the Carmack Amendment does not bar an award of punitive damages, and that in appropriate cases such damages may be awarded against a motor carrier under 49 U.”
United States v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 337 U.S. 426 (1949). “49 U. S. C. §§ 8 , 9. The complaint also sought relief from future exactions, but prior to the Commission’s final order the piers were returned to private ownership and this prayer was abandoned.”
United States v. ICC, 337 U.S. 426 (1949). “That section provides that such a suit "shall proceed in all respects like other civil suits for damages.”
Arrow Transp. Co. v. S. Ry. Co., 372 U.S. 658 (1963). “In addition § 8 of the Act, 49 U. S. C. § 8 , creates a private right of action for damagesbased upon conduct violative of the Actwhich might be available, though we have no occasion here to decide the question, to a competitor claiming that a proposed rate reduction had been…”
Bhd. of Ry. & S.S. Clerks v. Florida East Coast Ry. Co., 384 U.S. 238 (1966). “" 49 U. S. C. § 8 (1964 ed.) provides in part: "In case any common carrier subject to the provisions of this chapter shall do, cause to be done, or permit to be done any act, matter, or thing in this chapter prohibited or declared to be unlawful, or shall omit to do any act,…”
TI ME Inc. v. United States, 359 U.S. 464 (1959). “and all rules and regulations affecting or pertaining to such rates or charges shall be just and reasonable, and any such rate or charge that is not just and reasonable is hereby declared to be unlawful.”
Nazareth Gates v. John Collier, Superintendent of the Mississippi State Penitentiary, 616 F.2d 1268 (5th Cir. 1980). “…Mar. 3, 1887 (aliens holding land) § 6, 48 U.S.C. § 1506 (1970); Interstate Commerce Act §§ 8, 15, 16, 222, 308, 417, 49 U.S.C. §§ 8 , 15(9), 16(2), 322(b), 908(b), 1017(b) (1970); Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act Amendments of 1976 § 8, 49 U.S.C.A. § 1686 (e) (1976); Housing…”
Interstate Com. Comm'n v. Atl. Coast Line R., 383 U.S. 576 (1966). “382 , as amended, 49 U. S. C. §§ 8 and 9 (1964 ed.). The Commission sustained the complaint and issued a report finding that *578 the assailed rates were unjust and unreasonable and that the shipper was entitled to reparations.”
Dorothy C. Parker v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 561 F.2d 320 (D.C. Cir. 1977). “Under §§ 8 and 16(2) of that Act, see 49 U.S.C. §§ 8 , 16(2) (1970), the Supreme Court affirmed an award of attorneys’ fees to the extent it covered services rendered in connection with the enforcement suit in District Court but disallowed that part of the award which covered…”
Washington Terminal Co. v. Boswell, 124 F.2d 235 (D.C. Cir. 1941). “380 , 49 U.S.C.A. § 3 (1887) of the Interstate Commerce Act makes it unlawful for a carrier to subject any person or traffic to unreasonable disadvantage, and while Section 8, 24 Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.