5 U.S.C. § 261
SHORT TITLE.
“This title may be cited as the ‘Administrative Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2023’.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1946–1964 · leading case: Falsone v. United States, 205 F.2d 734 (5th Cir. 1953).
Falsone v. United States, 205 F.2d 734 (5th Cir. 1953). “” This provision is brought forward as 5 U.S.C.A. § 261 . 13 . Bart 10.2, See. (f), provides the following: “An agent enrolled before the Treasury Department shall have ihe same rights, powers, and privileges and be subject to the same duties as an enrolled aiiornoy: Provided,…”
James D. Russo v. The United States of Am., 241 F.2d 285 (2d Cir. 1957). “See 5 U.S.C.A. § 261 , 26 C.F.R. 601.4(d) (1949 ed.”
Meyerhoff v. Garten, 232 F. Supp. 363 (D. Maryland 1964). “ondents contend that the issue whether or not they have such a lien turns on the nature of the relationship created by the powers of attorney, and the effect of the powers upon the existing attorney-client relationship; that the decision of that issue requires a consideration of…”
Merlin M. Evans v. Robert C. Watson, Comm'r of Patents, 269 F.2d 775 (D.C. Cir. 1959). “The record discloses that under the Treasury Statute, 5 U.S.C.A. § 261 , the Veterans Administration Statute, 38 U.”
Camp v. Herzog, 104 F. Supp. 134 (D.D.C. 1952). “334 [ 5 U.S.C.A. § 261 ]; Act July 4, 1884, 23 Stat.”
Harry J. Alker, Jr. v. George M. Humphrey, Sec'y of the Treasury, 247 F.2d 22 (D.C. Cir. 1957). “…The record does not support either point. The judgment of the District Court is Affirmed. 1 . 23 Stat. 258 (1884), 5 U.S.C.A. § 261 .”
Tinkoff v. Campbell, 158 F.2d 855 (7th Cir. 1946). “230, published pursuant to 5 U.S.C.A. § 261 , has refused ,to permit him to represent taxpayers in explaining adjustments and computations in their returns or to accompany them upon interviews necessitated by such returns.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.