5 U.S.C. § 7

POWERS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 5 CasesGoogle Scholar

“(a)Mails.—The Council may use the United States mails in the same manner and under the same conditions as other Federal agencies.“(b)Administrative Support Services.—The Administrator of General Services shall provide to the Council, on a reimbursable basis, such administrative support services as the Council may request.“(c)Official Data.—The Council may secure directly from any Federal agency information necessary to carry out its functions under this Act. Each such agency is authorized and directed to furnish, to the extent permitted by law, any information requested by the Council.“(d)Gifts.—The Council—“(1) may accept money and other property donated, bequeathed, or devised to the Council without condition or restriction (other than that it be used to carry out the work of the Council); and“(2) may use, sell, or otherwise dispose of any such property to carry out its functions under this Act, except that, upon the termination of the Council, any such property shall be disposed of in accordance with applicable provisions of law governing the disposal of Federal property.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 9 cases, 1936–2019 · leading case: Richards v. United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2019).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Richards v. United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2019). “§ 1346 (e), and 5 U.S.C. § 7 [.]” Jd. In their ex parte 6 || motion, plaintiffs request this Court take jurisdiction of San Francisco Court Case CUD-18-662405, 7 an unlawful detainer action.”

Rollerson v. Port Freeport (S.D. Tex. 2019). “” 5 U.S.C. §7 02. Notwithstanding this broad definition, the APA limits the sort of agency actions to which it applies.”

Kennington v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd. (Fed. Cir. 2011). “Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7 '7U3(a)(2), the Board is desig- nated as the respondent when the Board's decision con- cerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board.”

Geiren v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd. (Fed. Cir. 2011). “Geiren has not responded Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7 7U3(a)(2), the Board is desig- nated as the respondent when the Board‘s decision con- cerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board.”

Cooper v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd. (Fed. Cir. 2011). “Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7 703(a)(2), the Board is desig- nated as the respondent when the Board's decision con- cerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board.”

Auth. to Investigate Fed. Aviation Admin. Emp. Complaints Alleging Reprisal for Whistleblowing (OLC 1997). “ble provisions of sections 1214 6 Among the provisions explicitly applied to the FAA under section 347(b), for example, chapter 73 of title 5 incorporates an entire program o f penalties and procedures governing employee “ suitability, security, and conduct “ It includes…”

Auth. of USDA to Award Monetary Relief for Discrimination (OLC 1994). “5 U.S.C. § 7 0 2 .11 “[T]he caselaw of [the Court of Appeals for the D istrict of C o lumbia Circuit] confirms that ‘the [APA] waiver applies to any suit, whether under the APA .”

Application of Emoluments Clause to Part-Time Consultant for the Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n (OLC 1986). “6 W e also indicated in 1982, as su p p o rt for this proposition, that in enacting the Foreign Gifts and D ecorations A ct o f 1966, 5 U.S.C. § 7 3 4 2 , C ongress assum ed w ithout discussion that the Em oluments C lause requires congressional consent before a n y governm ent…”

Filling the Vacancy Following the Death of the Sec'y of War (OLC 1936). “5 U.S.C. § 7 (1934). Reading sections 177, 179, and 180 together, it is my opinion that the tempo- rary filling of a vacancy occasioned by the death or resignation of the head of a department may not be for a period of more than 30 days.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.