Notes of Decisions
State Ex Rel. Nixon v. McClure, 969 S.W.2d 801 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).
· cites it 9× “” 3 In that reply, the State argued that McClure’s civil service benefits were not protected by 5 U.S.C. § 8346 because that protection ceased once the funds were placed in the possession of a beneficiary.”
Ridgway v. Ridgway, 454 U.S. 46 (1981).
· cites it 2× “III) (Public Safety Officers' Death benefits); 45 U. S. C. § 231m (Railroad Retirement benefits).”
Boyd v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 851 F.3d 1309 (Fed. Cir. 2017).
· cites it 2× “A Regarding OPM’s collection of FERS overpayments, 5 U.S.C. § 8346 (b) provides, in pertinent part: Recovery of payments under this sub-chapter [including FERS annuity benefits] may not be made from an individual when, in the judgment of the Office of Personnel Management, the…”
Bertha Tom v. First Am. Credit Union, 151 F.3d 1289 (1st Cir. 1998).
· cites it 3× “Count II: Civil Service Retirement Act ( 5 U.S.C. § 8346 ) The district court also held that the Credit Union’s, seizure of Mrs.”
McNeil v. United States, 78 Fed. Cl. 211 (Fed. Cl. 2007).
· cites it 2× “¶¶ 27, 30 (citing 5 U.S.C. §§ 8346 , 8467(a)(l)-(2), 8470(a)-(b)).”
SSA Baltimore Fed. Credit Union v. Bizon, 42 B.R. 338 (D. Maryland 1984).
· cites it 5× “§ 541 (c)(2) and 5 U.S.C. § 8346 (a). 5 On appeal, SSA contends that Bizon’s interest in his retirement fund is neither excludable from the estate in bankruptcy under subsection 541(c)(2), nor exempt from his creditors under any provision of section 522.”
McNeil v. United States, 293 F. App'x 758 (Fed. Cir. 2008).
· cites it 2× “Liberally construed, McNeil’s brief on appeal raises four possible sources of substantive law: (1) the Administrative Procedure Act; (2) the authority of the Court of Federal Claims to adjudicate a tax dispute; (3) the Takings Clause; and (4) 5 U.S.C. §§ 8346 and 8470. We…”
Sims v. Sims, 358 So. 2d 919 (La. 1978).
“5 U.S.C. § 8346 (a). However, federal law does not preclude a state from classifying federal retirement rights as community property.”
Valdez v. Ramirez, 574 S.W.2d 748 (Tex. 1978).
· cites it 2× “§ 8346 (a), which provides: "The money mentioned by this subchapter [the Civil Service Retirement Act] is not assignable, either in law or equity, except under the provisions of section 8345(g) of this title [which gives the Civil Service Commission the power to approve…”
Thrash v. Thrash, 387 So. 2d 21 (La. Ct. App. 1980).
· cites it 3× “The federal retirement plan has an exemption provision, 5 U.S.C. § 8346 (a) [3] , which forbids the execution-sale or non-family assignment of the proceeds of the plan.”
— 5 U.S.C. § 8346(a) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Nixon v. McClure, 969 S.W.2d 801 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).
“” 3 In that reply, the State argued that McClure’s civil service benefits were not protected by 5 U.S.C. § 8346 because that protection ceased once the funds were placed in the possession of a beneficiary.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.