U.S. Code » Title 5 » Part PART III— EMPLOYEES › Subpart Subpart G— Insurance and Annuities › Chapter CHAPTER 85— UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— EMPLOYEES GENERALLY

5 U.S.C. § 8506

Dissemination of information

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 5 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Each agency of the United States and each wholly or partially owned instrumentality of the United States shall make available to State agencies which have agreements under this subchapter, or to the Secretary of Labor, as the case may be, such information concerning the Federal service and Federal wages of a Federal employee as the Secretary considers practicable and necessary for the determination of the entitlement of the Federal employee to compensation under this subchapter. The information shall include the findings of the employing agency concerning—(1) whether or not the Federal employee has performed Federal service;(2) the periods of Federal service;(3) the amount of Federal wages; and(4) the reasons for termination of Federal service.The employing agency shall make the findings in the form and manner prescribed by regulations of the Secretary. The regulations shall include provision for correction by the employing agency of errors and omissions. This subsection does not apply with respect to Federal service and Federal wages covered by subchapter II of this chapter.(b) The agency administering the unemployment compensation law of a State shall furnish the Secretary such information as he considers necessary or appropriate in carrying out this subchapter. The information is deemed the report required by the Secretary for the purpose of section 503(a)(6) of title 42.(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 589; Pub. L. 94–566, title III, § 313(a), Oct. 20, 1976, 90 Stat. 2680.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Derivation

U.S. Code

Revised Statutes and

Statutes at Large

 

42 U.S.C. 1367.

Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1212, § 4(a) “Sec. 1507”, 68 Stat. 1134.

 

 

Aug. 28, 1958, Pub. L. 85–848, § 4, 72 Stat. 1089.

 

 

Sept. 13, 1960, Pub. L. 86–778, § 531(f), 74 Stat. 984.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

Editorial NotesAmendments

1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–566 struck out provision that findings made in accordance with the Secretary’s regulations were final and conclusive for the purpose of sections 8502(d) and 8503(c) of this title.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1976 Amendment

Pub. L. 94–566, title III, § 313(b), Oct. 20, 1976, 90 Stat. 2680, provided that: “The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply with respect to findings made after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 20, 1976].”

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases, 1970–1996 · leading case: Christian v. New York State Dep't of Labor, Div. of Emp., 347 F. Supp. 1158 (S.D.N.Y. 1972).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Christian v. New York State Dep't of Labor, Div. of Emp., 347 F. Supp. 1158 (S.D.N.Y. 1972). · cites it 16× “The principal issue is whether the provisions of 5 U.S.C. § 8506 [1] and the regulations promulgated thereunder, which make the findings of the former Federal employer as to the reasons for termination binding and conclusive upon the State agency in its determination of…”
Thomas v. Dist. of Columbia Dep't of Labor, 409 A.2d 164 (D.C. 1979). “§ 313, amending 5 U.S.C. § 8506 (a) (Supp. 1978); see H.R.”
Weaver v. Wallace, 565 S.W.2d 867 (Tenn. 1978). “” The controlling federal statute, 5 U.S.C. § 8506 requires that state agencies such as the Tennessee Department of Employment Security in this case, when administering their unemployment insurance laws with respect to civilian federal employees, must accept as “final and…”
Anita Smith v. Dist. Unemployment Comp. Bd., Paul R. Ignatius, Sec'y of the Navy, 435 F.2d 433 (D.C. Cir. 1970). · cites it 3× “Particularly involved in the present case is 5 U.S.C. § 8506 (a), which pro *437 vides that the Federal employing agency shall make available to the State agency information concerning the employee’s Federal service and wages, and specifically its findings concerning “the…”
Carpenter v. Dist. Unemployment Comp. Bd., 409 A.2d 175 (D.C. 1979). · cites it 2× “As nearly as can be determined, the statements were to the effect that (1) petitioner “voluntarily resigned in lieu of termination due to absenteeism”, (2) she resigned “because my child is sick and I need to be at home”, and (3) “I am able, available, and actively seeking full…”
Christian v. New York State Dep't of Labor, 414 U.S. 614 (1974). “They sought certification as representatives of the class of persons similarly situated, the convening of a three-judge court, and declaratory, injunctive, and mandamus relief.”
Hill v. Commonwealth, 385 A.2d 1032 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1978). “2680 ( 5 U.S.C. §8506 note). This amendment applies only to findings made after the Act’s date of enactment, October 20, 1976.”
Jennings v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 675 A.2d 810 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1996). “5 U.S.C. § 8506 . The Pennsylvania legislature imposed a similar responsibility on the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry to cooperate with federal employing agencies in the administration of its agreement with the federal government to pay benefits to qualifying…”
Conrad v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., 47 Cal. App. 3d 237 (Cal. Ct. App. 1975). “2d 433 , appellant argues that the Appeals Board should have reviewed the initial SSA finding.”
Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review v. Van Travis, 354 A.2d 9 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1976). “The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirmed the determination of the referee and the instant appeal followed.”
Lenns v. Un. Comp. Bd. of Rev., 530 A.2d 528 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1987). · cites it 2× “5 U.S.C. §8506 (a). In the case sub judice, the Department of Agriculture submitted to Pennsylvania the required information, including findings concerning the petitioners wages.”
Strother v. Dist. of Columbia Dep't of Emp. Servs., 499 A.2d 1225 (D.C. 1985). “See 5 U.S.C. § 8506 (a) amended *1227 by Pub.”
Show all 15 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.