50 U.S.C. § 104

DIPLOMATIC INITIATIVES TO PREVENT HOSTILE ACTIVITIES BY IRAN AND DISRUPT AND DEGRADE HIZBALLAH’S ILLICIT NETWORKS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 50 CasesGoogle Scholar

“Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Hizballah International Financing Prevention Amendments Act of 2018 [Oct. 25, 2018], the President shall instruct the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, to increase cooperation with foreign governments to assist in strengthening the capacity of such governments to prevent hostile activity by Iran and disrupt and degrade Hizballah’s illicit activities, including diplomatic engagement that involves—“(1) efforts to target and expose illicit finance networks, arrest perpetrators, freeze assets, and address Iran and Hizballah’s use of illicit financial networks using international trade and banking systems;“(2) efforts to assist willing governments with the development of counter-organized crime legislation, the strengthening of financial investigative capacity, and a fully-vetted counter-organized crime judicial model in jurisdictions plagued with corruption; and“(3) efforts to persuade governments to list Hizballah as a terrorist organization.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 1942–1946 · leading case: People v. Mason, 165 P.2d 481 (Cal. Ct. App. 1946).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

People v. Mason, 165 P.2d 481 (Cal. Ct. App. 1946). “9066, dated February 19, 1942, stated that “the successful prosecution of the war requires every possible protection against espionage and against sabotage to national-defense material, national-defense premises, and national-defense utilities,” and the Secretary of War and…”

Ochikubo v. Bonesteel, 60 F. Supp. 916 (S.D. Cal. 1945). · cites it 3× “uately secured against sabotage and espionage by either the long standing statutes against espionage with the penalties ranging from a maximum of ten years’ imprisonment 26 to death 27 or by the 1918 Acts as they were amended in 1940 with the greatly enlarged and broadened…”

United States v. Minoru Yasui, 48 F. Supp. 40 (D. Or. 1942). “3 50 U.S.C.A. § 104 , Act of August 21, 1941, 55 Stat.”

Von Knorr v. Miles, 60 F. Supp. 962 (D. Mass. 1945). “655 , 50 U.S.C.A. § 104 . “National-defense premises” include all “places wherein such national-defense material is being produced.”

Ebel v. Drum, 52 F. Supp. 189 (D. Mass. 1943). “104 [ 50 U.S.C.A. § 104 ]).” By virtue of the authority vested in him as President and Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy, the President purported to “authorize and direct the Secretary of War, and the Military Commanders whom he may from time to time designate, whenever he…”

Toyosaburo Korematsu v. United States, 140 F.2d 289 (9th Cir. 1943). “655 , 50 U.S.C.A. § 104 : "Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority vested in me as President of the United States, and Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy, I hereby authorize and direct the Secretary of War, and the Military Commanders who he may from time to time…”

Ex Parte Lincoln Seiichi Kanai, 46 F. Supp. 286 (E.D. Wis. 1942). “655 , 50 U.S.C.A. § 104 , and pursuant to his constitutional authority as commander in chief of the army and navy, authorized and directed the Secretary of War and the military commanders designated by him to prescribe military areas in such places and of such extent as the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.