50 U.S.C. § 301
RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.
“Nothing in this Act or any amendment made by this Act shall apply to the authorized intelligence activities of the United States.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1941–2021 · leading case: Dale Huhmann v. Fed. Express Corp., 874 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir. 2017).
Dale Huhmann v. Fed. Express Corp., 874 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir. 2017). “The rights that Congress sought to clarify in enacting USERRA were first contained in the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 50 U.S.C. § 301 et seq. See 70 Fed. Reg. at 75,246.”
Joyce Morgan v. Skf Usa, Inc., 385 F.3d 989 (6th Cir. 2004). “In distinguishing a layoff from a discharge, the Supreme Court noted that a-layoff is defined as “A period during which a workman is temporarily dismissed or allowed to leave his work; that part or season of the year during which activity in a particular business or game is…”
Infirst Bank v. Jager (In re Jager), 597 B.R. 796 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 2019). “Unable to afford counsel, the petitioner wrote a letter to the ACLU seeking help but before he was able to mail it he was arrested on charges under the Selective Service Act, 50 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq. During his imprisonment, FBI agents confiscated his letter to the ACLU-not…”
Rivera-Melendez v. Pfizer Pharm., LLC, 730 F.3d 49 (1st Cir. 2013). “The rights that Congress sought to clarify in enacting USERRA were first contained in the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 50 U.S.C. § 301 et seq. See 70 Fed.Reg. at 75,246.”
Zuziak v. United States, 119 F.2d 140 (9th Cir. 1941). “The appeal is from a judgment of conviction for a violation of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 50 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq. The indictment charged that appellant, being a male citizen of the United States of the age of thirty-one years, and under the duty to present…”
Michael Moss v. UAL (7th Cir. 2021). “885 , 890 (codified at 50 U.S.C. § 301 et seq. (repealed 1955)).”
Morgan v. SKF USA, Inc. (6th Cir. 2004). “275 (1946), the Supreme Court was interpreting the term “discharge” under the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 50 U.S.C. § 301 (repealed 1955). In distinguishing a layoff from a discharge, the Supreme Court noted that a layoff is defined as “A period during which a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.