50 U.S.C. § 3934
Stay or vacation of execution of judgments, attachments, and garnishments
This section applies to an action or proceeding commenced in a court against a servicemember before or during the period of the servicemember’s military service or within 90 days after such service terminates.
Section was formerly classified to section 524 of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
A prior section 204 of act Oct. 17, 1940, ch. 888, art. II, 54 Stat. 1181, related to duration and term of stays and codefendants not in service, prior to the general amendment of this Act by Pub. L. 108–189. See section 3935 of this title.
Section applicable to any case not final before
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2017–2026 · leading case: Carrelo v. Keystone RV Co. (E.D. Va. 2024).
Carrelo v. Keystone RV Co. (E.D. Va. 2024). “14);? and, (2) Plaintiff Edgar Carrelo’s Motion to Stay Proceedings Pursuant to 50 U.S.C. § 3934 of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (“SCRA”), 50 U.”
Carrelo v. Keystone RV Co. (N.D. Ind. 2024). “14);? and, (2) Plaintiff Edgar Carrelo’s Motion to Stay Proceedings Pursuant to 50 U.S.C. § 3934 of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (“SCRA”), 50 U.”
John C. Parkinson v. Michael L. Parkinson & William L. Parkinson (mem. dec.) (Ind. Ct. App. 2017). “50 U.S.C. § 3934 (a). [16] There is no question that Chris provided documentation with his January 2015 Motion to Stay that would have satisfied the requirements of Section 3932.”
Rouse v. Moore (D. Maryland 2024). “50 U.S.C. § 3934 (a). The court shall do so on application by the servicemember and may do so on its own motion.”
Lynch v. City Of New York (S.D.N.Y. 2021). “, 50 U.S.C. § 3934 , support staying the subpoena until Lombardo returns from active duty.”
Roybal v. Raulli (N.C. Ct. App. 2026). “The trial court issued 9 Exhibit B is a copy of 50 U.S.C.A. § 3934 , a section of the SCRA addressing stays when a servicemember “is materially affected by reason of military service in complying with a court judgment or order.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.