50 U.S.C. § 796
Effect of subchapter on other criminal laws
The foregoing provisions of this subchapter shall be construed as being in addition to and not in modification of existing criminal statutes.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1954–1958 · leading case: Junius Irving Scales v. United States, 227 F.2d 581 (4th Cir. 1955).
Junius Irving Scales v. United States, 227 F.2d 581 (4th Cir. 1955). “1003 , 50 U.S.C.A. § 796 , which provides: “The foregoing provisions of this title shall be construed as being in addition to and not in modification of existing criminal statutes”.”
The United States of Am. v. Claude Mark Lightfoot, 228 F.2d 861 (7th Cir. 1956). “1003 , 50 U.S.C.A. § 796 , which provides: ‘The foregoing provisions of this title shall be construed as being in addition to and not in modification of existing criminal statutes.”
United States v. Kuzma, 141 F. Supp. 91 (E.D. Pa. 1954). “The contention under this heading needs but a short answer, for § 17 of the same Act, 50 U.S.C.A. § 796 , specifically states: “The foregoing provisions of this subchapter shall be construed as being in addition to and not in modification of existing cxfiminal statutes”.”
United States v. Blumberg, 136 F. Supp. 269 (E.D. Pa. 1955). “” This conclusion is confirmed by Section 17 of the same Act, 50 U.S.C.A. § 796 which provides: “The foregoing provisions of this title [subchapter] shall be construed as being in addition to and not in modification of existing criminal statutes.”
United States v. John Francis Noto, 262 F.2d 501 (2d Cir. 1958). “Indeed Section 4(f) was enacted by Congress to preserve the constitutionality of the registration provisions in the Internal Security Act and Congress expressly stated in Section 17 ( 50 U.S.C.A. § 796 ): “The foregoing provisions of this title shall be construed as being in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.