7 U.S.C. § 1781
Repealed. Pub. L. 103–130, § 4(a), Nov. 1, 1993, 107 Stat. 1369
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1961–1986 · leading case: Gross v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 605 (Ct. Cl. 1974).
Gross v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 605 (Ct. Cl. 1974). “Likewise, the National Wool Act, as amended, 7 U.S.C. §§ 1781 , 1785 (1970), contains such a finality provision, also in substantially identical language (at § 1785) and it too has been construed and applied in this manner.”
Tom Stone v. United States, 286 F.2d 56 (8th Cir. 1961). “The action was commenced by the United States of America to recover damages from the defendant based upon monies erroneously paid to him for the 1955 marketing year as incentive payments under the National Wool Act of 1954 ( 7 U.S.C.A. § 1781 et seq.). The complaint *57 was in…”
In Re Mahleres, 53 B.R. 86 (Bankr.D. Colo. 1985). “56, representing a wool incentive payment from an agency of the United States, pursuant to the National Wool Act of 1954 ( 7 U.S.C. § 1781 ). Ranchers are paid by the government to cultivate sheep and to sell the wool for the best possible price.”
In Re Patsantaras Land & Livestock Co., 60 B.R. 24 (Bankr.D. Colo. 1986). “Since 1954, the Federal government has been making such payments, pursuant to the National Wool Act of 1954, 7 U.S.C. § 1781 et seq., in an effort to motivate ranchers to grow sheep and sell the wool at the best price.”
United States v. James W. Blackwell & Everett Blackwell, 467 F.2d 1377 (5th Cir. 1972). “Appellants were sued by the United States to recover incentive payments made under the National Wool Act of 1954, 7 U.S.C. § 1781 et seq. The government filed a motion for summary judgment on the basis of an administrative record compiled by the Agricultural Stabilization and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.