7 U.S.C. § 1831
Repealed. Pub. L. 89–321, title VI, § 601, Nov. 3, 1965, 79 Stat. 1206
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases, 1959–1992 · leading case: Wilson Dickson v. Mrs. C. O. Edwards, 293 F.2d 211 (5th Cir. 1961).
Wilson Dickson v. Mrs. C. O. Edwards, 293 F.2d 211 (5th Cir. 1961). “Under 7 U.S.C.A. § 1831 (d) he complained to the County Committee and thereafter to the State Committee.”
Glen H. Shay Et Ux. v. Agric. Stabilization & Conservation State Comm. for Arizona, 299 F.2d 516 (9th Cir. 1962). “The court below had jurisdiction under § 107(d) ( 7 U.S.C.A. § 1831 (d)). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.”
United States v. Johnson, 284 F. Supp. 273 (W.D. Mo. 1968). “Each of the cases acknowledged the statutory provision that only a violation of a substantial nature will warrant termination of the contract, 7 U.S.C. § 1831 (a) (6) (A). 7U.S.C. § 1831(a) (6) (B) provides other civil remedies in the event there has been a violation of the…”
Thomas v. Dudrey, 494 P.2d 1039 (Kan. 1972). “, supra; 7 U.S.C.A. § 1831 [ b ].) The Soil Bank Act directs the Secretary to provide safeguards to protect the interests of tenants for sharing on a fair and equitable *702 basis in payments for withdrawing lands they farm under a farm lease, from production, including such as…”
United States v. Yarbrough, 290 F. Supp. 4 (N.D. Miss. 1968). “What is at issue, however, is defendant’s assertion that, since Yarbrough’s contract was “terminated” by the intra-agency adjudicatory process, the proceedings should have been conducted pursuant to 7 U.”
Elliott v. United States, 179 F. Supp. 758 (D. Neb. 1959). “Elliott, pursuant to Section 107(d) ( 7 U.S.C.A. § 1831 (d) of the Soil Bank Act ( 7 U.”
Gibson v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 347 F. Supp. 560 (E.D. Mich. 1972). “1961), which held that a complaint by a tenant against his landlord for termination of a lease in violation of the Soil Bank Act ( 7 U.S.C. § 1831 ) was properly brought in federal court.”
Maxwell v. Benson, 173 F. Supp. 75 (N.D. Iowa 1959). “Direct and specific answers as to this query are in the procedural provisions found in and the factual background required for jurisdiction, under 7 U.S.C.A. § 1831 (d), which provides: “A contract shall not be terminated under paragraph (6) of subsection (a) of this section…”
Caulfield v. U. S. Dep't of Agric., 293 F.2d 217 (5th Cir. 1961). “It is this basic controversy — did the Tenant leave voluntarily or was he evicted? — on which trial de novo was sought under 7 U.S.C.A. § 1831 (d). This brief recitation makes two things clear.”
Holden v. United States, 187 F. Supp. 790 (E.D. Ark. 1960). “Jurisdiction is invoked under 7 U.S.C.A. § 1831 (d). The actions were commenced originally against the State Committee and its Executive Officer.”
Fred Baldridge v. John R. Hadley, & United States of Am., Intervenor-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, 491 F.2d 859 (10th Cir. 1974). “The governing jurisdictional statute is 7 U.S.C. § 1831 (d) which authorizes a trial de novo in United States District Court of the decision of the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Commit *861 tee.”
Reimann v. United States, 196 F. Supp. 134 (D. Idaho 1961). “7 U.S.C.A. § 1831 (d). Plaintiffs concede that if the contract is valid, harvesting the wheat was such a violation as would justify a forfeiture or termination of the contract.”
— 7 U.S.C. § 1831(a) — 1 case
United States v. Johnson, 284 F. Supp. 273 (W.D. Mo. 1968). “Each of the cases acknowledged the statutory provision that only a violation of a substantial nature will warrant termination of the contract, 7 U.S.C. § 1831 (a) (6) (A). 7U.S.C. § 1831(a) (6) (B) provides other civil remedies in the event there has been a violation of the…”
— 7 U.S.C. § 1831(d) — 1 case
Glen H. Shay Et Ux. v. Agric. Stabilization & Conservation State Comm. for Arizona, 299 F.2d 516 (9th Cir. 1962). “The court below had jurisdiction under § 107(d) ( 7 U.S.C.A. § 1831 (d)). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.