7 U.S.C. § 217
Proceedings for suspension of orders
For the purposes of this subchapter, the provisions of all laws relating to the suspending or restraining the enforcement, operation, or execution of, or the setting aside in whole or in part the orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission, are made applicable to the jurisdiction, powers, and duties of the Secretary in enforcing the provisions of this subchapter, and to any person subject to the provisions of this subchapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18
cases, 1928–1968 · leading case: United States v. Morgan, 313 U.S. 409 (1941).
United States v. Morgan, 313 U.S. 409 (1941). “On appeal here, 7 U.S.C. § 217 ; 28 U.S.C. §§ 44 , 47a, the case was sent back to the district court in order to determine on the issues raised by the pleadings whether the agencies had been denied the "full hearing" demanded by § 310 of the Act.”
Allen v. State Bd. of Elections, 393 U.S. 544 (1968). “168 , 7 U. S. C. § 217 (suits to restrain enforcement of orders of the Secretary of Agriculture); 28 U.”
United States v. Morgan, 307 U.S. 183 (1939). “168 ; 7 U.S.C. § 217 ; 38 Stat. 220 , 28 U.S.C.”
Denver Union Stock Yard Co. v. United States, 57 F.2d 735 (D. Colo. 1932). “Issues were joined, and the cause came on for hearing before a three judge court as required by section 316 of the Packers and Stockyards Act (7 USC 217 [7 USCA § 217]). The only evidence offered was the record made before the Secretary of Agriculture.”
Denver Union Stock Yard Co. v. United States, 304 U.S. 470 (1938). “” 2 7 U. S. C. § 217 ; 28 U. S. C. §§ 44 , 47 (a).”
St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United States, 11 F. Supp. 322 (W.D. Mo. 1935). “524 , that “a proceeding under section 316 of the Packers and Stockyards Act [7 USCA § 217] is a judicial review, not a trial de novo.”
Farmers' Livestock Comm'n Co. v. United States, 54 F.2d 375 (E.D. Ill. 1931). “Under section 316 of the act (7 USCA § 217) the jurisdiction of this court over the action of the Secretary is the same as that over the action of the Interstate Commerce Commission.”
Am. Comm'n Co. v. United States, 11 F. Supp. 965 (D. Colo. 1935). “168 ; 7 USCA § 217; 28 USCA § 47. The bill alleges that on November 20, 1933, the Secretary, under authority of the act, pursuant to an order of notice to the petitioners and others doing business on the Denver market, gave notice of a hearing to determine the lawfulness of any…”
Denver Union Stock Yard Co. v. United States, 21 F. Supp. 83 (D. Colo. 1937). “The plaintiff brought this action (authorized by 7 U.S.C.A. § 217 , section 316 of the same act) to restrain the enforcement of said order.”
United States v. Sosnowitz & Lotstein, Inc., 50 F. Supp. 586 (D. Conn. 1943). “1229 ; and into the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921, § 316, 7 U.S. C.A. § 217. See Inghram v. Union Stockyards, 8 Cir.”
Sioux City Stock Yards Co. v. United States, 49 F. Supp. 801 (N.D. Iowa 1943). “168 , 7 U.S.C.A. § 217 , and 36 Stat. 1149 , 38 Stat.”
Union Stock Yards Co. of Omaha, Ltd. v. United States, 9 F. Supp. 864 (D. Neb. 1934). “This is a suit in equity brought by the Union Stock Yards Company of Omaha in accordance with section 316 of the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921 (7 USCA § 217) to enjoin the enforcement of the order of the Secretary of Agriculture of March 1, 1933, prescribing maximum rates…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.