7 U.S.C. § 6901
Purpose
The purpose of this chapter is to provide the Secretary of Agriculture with the necessary authority to streamline and reorganize the Department of Agriculture to achieve greater efficiency, effectiveness, and economies in the organization and management of the programs and activities carried out by the Department.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1995–2016 · leading case: Austin v. United States, 118 Fed. Cl. 776 (Fed. Cl. 2014).
Austin v. United States, 118 Fed. Cl. 776 (Fed. Cl. 2014). “Pro Se Plaintiffs, Breach of Contract; Motion to Dismiss; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Failure to State a Claim; Federal Crop Insurance Reform and Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994, 7 U.S.C. § 6901 , et seq. OPINION HORN, J.”
Huff v. Vilsack, 195 F. Supp. 3d 343 (D.D.C. 2016). “§ 6991 (1), of the USDA related to agency-administered programs in 1994, pursuant to the Federal Crop Insurance Reform and Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq. The National Appeals Division (“NAD”), which wqs established as a department within…”
Allied Home Mortg. Capital Corp. v. United States, 95 Fed. Cl. 769 (Fed. Cl. 2010). “3178 (codified at 7 U.S.C. § 6901 , et seq. (2006)) (the Reorganization Act).”
In Re 2000 Sugar Beet Crop Ins. Litig., 228 F. Supp. 2d 999 (D. Minnesota 2002). “” 7 U.S.C. § 6901 . By its very nature, exhaustion may result in occasional redundancies, but it still serves its intended purpose of administrative efficiency and certainty.”
Ace Prop. & Cas. Ins. v. Fed. Crop Ins., 517 F. Supp. 2d 391 (D.D.C. 2007). “Furthermore, FCIC notes that Congress granted it authority under the Reorganization Act of 1994, 7 U.S.C. §§ 6901 et seq., to “streamline and reorganize the Department of Agriculture to achieve greater efficiency, effectiveness, and economies in the organization and management…”
Gleichman v. US Dept. of Agric., 896 F. Supp. 42 (D. Me. 1995). “" 7 U.S.C. § 6901 . This location suggests a wideranging effect.”
Big Cats of Serenity Springs, Inc. v. Vilsack, 84 F. Supp. 3d 1179 (D. Colo. 2015). “Defendants rely on The Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994, 7 U.S.C. § 6901 , et seq., to argue that Plaintiffs must exhaust all administrative remedies before filing suit against .”
Farmers & Merchants Bank of Eatonton v. United States, 43 Fed. Cl. 38 (Fed. Cl. 1999). “7 U.S.C. § 6901 (1994). As part of the reorganization, the following functions were transferred to the new National Appeals Division: There are transferred to the Division all functions exercised and all administrative appeals pending before the effective date of this subchapter…”
Bastek v. Fed. Crop Ins., 975 F. Supp. 534 (S.D.N.Y. 1997). “12(c), to dismiss for lack of subject matter *536 jurisdiction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.