U.S. Code
»
Title 7
» Chapter CHAPTER 98— DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE REORGANIZATION › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER VIII— NATIONAL APPEALS DIVISION
7 U.S.C. § 6993
Transfer of functions
There are transferred to the Division all functions exercised and all administrative appeals pending before the effective date of this subchapter (including all related functions of any officer or employee) of or relating to—(1) the National Appeals Division established by section 1433e(c) 11 See References in Text note below. of this title (as in effect on the day before October 13, 1994);(2) the National Appeals Division established by subsections (d) through (g) of section 1983b 1 of this title (as in effect on the day before October 13, 1994);(3) appeals of decisions made by the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation; and(4) appeals of decisions made by the Soil Conservation Service (as in effect on the day before October 13, 1994).(Pub. L. 103–354, title II, § 273, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3230.)Editorial NotesReferences in TextThe effective date of this subchapter, referred to in text, probably means the date of enactment of Pub. L. 103–354, which was approved Oct. 13, 1994.
Section 1433e of this title, referred to in par. (1), was repealed by Pub. L. 103–354, title II, § 281(b), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3233.
Section 1983b of this title, referred to in par. (2), was repealed by Pub. L. 103–354, title II, § 281(c), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3233.
Notes of Decisions
Farmers & Merchants Bank of Eatonton v. United States, 43 Fed. Cl. 38 (Fed. Cl. 1999).
· cites it 2× “7 U.S.C. § 6993 (1994). The statute also explicitly states: “A final determination of the Division shall be review *41 able and enforceable by any United States district court of competent jurisdiction in accordance with chapter 7 of title 5.”
Bruhn v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 749 (Fed. Cl. 2006).
“7 U.S.C. § 6993 (1994), H.R.Rep. No. 103-714, Question 4.”
Chamblee v. Espy, 100 F.3d 15 (4th Cir. 1996).
“See 7 U.S.C. § 6993 . The new statutes provide appeal rights and procedures similar to those provided in § 1983b.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.