7 U.S.C. § 1433e

Repealed. Pub. L. 103–354, title II, § 281(b), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3233

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 7 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1992–2000 · leading case: Strong v. Glickman, 50 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 1999).
Strong v. Glickman, 50 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 1999). · cites it 2× “” See 7 U.S.C. § 1433e (1993). It is significant that when § 1433e was codified in 1990, Congress did not repeal § 1385.”
Vandervelde v. Yeutter, 789 F. Supp. 24 (D.D.C. 1992). “Plaintiffs shall then have the right to appeal the Deputy Administrator’s decision on remand to the National Appeals Division, authorized by the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, 7 U.S.C. § 1433e. I On November 28,1990, Congress enacted the Food,…”
Brent Harrod v. Dan Glickman, 206 F.3d 783 (8th Cir. 2000). “7 U.S.C.A. § 1433e(g) (1994) (repealed, but see 7 U.”
— 7 U.S.C. § 1433e(g) — 2 cases
Strong v. Glickman, 50 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 1999). “” See 7 U.S.C. § 1433e (1993). It is significant that when § 1433e was codified in 1990, Congress did not repeal § 1385.”
Brent Harrod v. Dan Glickman, 206 F.3d 783 (8th Cir. 2000). “7 U.S.C.A. § 1433e(g) (1994) (repealed, but see 7 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.