8 U.S.C. § 104
Repealed. Dec. 17, 1943, ch. 344, § 1, 57 Stat. 600
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1932–2024 · leading case: United States ex rel. Fong on v. Day, 54 F.2d 990 (2d Cir. 1932).
United States ex rel. Fong on v. Day, 54 F.2d 990 (2d Cir. 1932). “A person of Chinese descent claiming the right to enter the United States as a citizen is not entitled to a judicial hearing on the issue of his citizenship.”
Pietersen v. US Dep't of State, No. 2022-3544 (D.D.C. Mar. 21, 2024). “And contrary to the plaintiffs’ suggestion, see Opp’n at 21, the State Department’s adherence to consular independence does not abdicate responsibility under the second exception; rather, it reflects respect for Congress’ command of consular independence, see 8 U.S.C. § 104 (a).…”
You v. Acheson, 109 F. Supp. 98 (S.D. Tex. 1952). “Moreover, § 104 of the Act [ 8 U.S.C.A. § 104 ] provides that for the purpose of certain designated sections, including 201, ‘the place of general abode shall be deemed the place of residence.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.