8 U.S.C. § 1106
Repealed. Pub. L. 91–510, title IV, § 422(a), Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1189
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1999–2007 · leading case: R-S-J
R-S-J (1999)
“The Ninth Circuit further found that “false oral statements made under oath in a question-and-answer statement before an INS officer in con- nection with any stage of the processing of a visa constitute false testimony within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1106 (f)(6).” Id. We note…”
Plewa v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1999)
“Although there is no materiality requirement in 8 U.S.C. § 1106 (f)(6), based on these cases and the purpose of the statute, it seems incongruous that Congress would consider an innocent mistake, misinterpretation, or incorrect statement as grounds to disqualify an otherwise…”
Martinez v. Ashcroft (2004)
“Martinez argues that the IJ’s ruling on this issue was based on a finding that Martinez lied at the hearing, making him statutorily ineligible for a finding of good moral character under 8 U.S.C. § 1106 (f)(6) (excluding “one who has given false testimony for the purpose of…”
Adriana Rosario Fuenmayor v. U.S. Atty. Gen. (2007)
“Fuenmayor’s petition for review was filed three months after the November order and a full five months after the September order.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.