8 U.S.C. § 351 to 416
Repealed or transferred
8 U.S.C. § 401 has no page of its own: the Office of the Law Revision Counsel prints it together with other sections as the single entry 8 U.S.C. § 351 to 416, shown below.
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1966–1987 · leading case: Beys Afroyim v. Dean Rusk, 361 F.2d 102 (2d Cir. 1966).
Beys Afroyim v. Dean Rusk, 361 F.2d 102 (2d Cir. 1966). “In Trop , on the facts there, the Court held that 8 U.S.C. § 401 (g), now 8 U.S.C. § 1481 (a) (8), again a different provision from 8 U.”
In re Anonymous No. 29 D.B. 77, 7 Pa. D. & C.3d 510 (Pa. 1978). “District Court for the [ ] District of Pennsylvania, which charged respondent with violations ofl8U.S.C.A.§401(l) and *516 (2), to which he pleaded guilty in October of 1976, and was fined the sum of $2,000.”
In re Anonymous No. 76 D.B. 83, 47 Pa. D. & C.3d 138 (Pa. 1987). “We concur with respondent in that his factual circumstances can be differentiated from the above two cases in that in the former case the attorney in question was found in violation ofl8U.S.C. §401 (contempt) based on his conduct in making misrepresentations to a client’s…”
8 U.S.C. § 401(l): 1 case
In re Anonymous No. 29 D.B. 77, 7 Pa. D. & C.3d 510 (Pa. 1978). “District Court for the [ ] District of Pennsylvania, which charged respondent with violations ofl8U.S.C.A.§401(l) and *516 (2), to which he pleaded guilty in October of 1976, and was fined the sum of $2,000.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.