8 U.S.C. § 701
This title may be cited as ‘Cuban Political Prisoners and Immigrants’.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases, 1942–2004 · leading case: Bindczyck v. Finucane, 342 U.S. 76 (1951).
Bindczyck v. Finucane, 342 U.S. 76 (1951). “1137 , 1140, 8 U. S. C. § 701 (a), are here canvassed.”
Citizens Prot. League v. Clark, 155 F.2d 290 (D.C. Cir. 1946). “1140 , 8 U.S.C.A. § 701 . 5 Id. at par. (d). 6 National War Labor Board v.”
United States v. Bergmann, 47 F. Supp. 765 (S.D. Cal. 1942). “The defendant has denied these allegations and has protested his loyalty to the Government of the United States. Has the charge been proved ? Naturalization is a privilege.”
Ex parte Lee Fong Fook, 74 F. Supp. 68 (N.D. Cal. 1948). “1140 , 8 U.S.C.A. § 701 ), then of course such a decree would be fully binding on the United States and could only be attacked in the manner provided by Federal Statute.”
Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Collins, 359 F.3d 156 (2d Cir. 2004). “The Court had no occasion in deciding Chaney , however, nor has it had occasion since, to apply this hypothetical “abdication” principle to the presumption of non-reviewability. The present petition challenges a different agency and a different statute.”
Knauff v. Shaughnessy, 179 F.2d 628 (2d Cir. 1950). “By refusing to act on the appellant’s preliminary petition the appellee interposed an obstacle to the exercise of the district court’s jurisdiction to naturalize, conferred by 8 U.S.C.A. § 701 . Power to issue writs in aid of its jurisdiction is declared by 28 U.”
Le Baron v. Kern Cnty. Farm Labor Union, 80 F. Supp. 151 (S.D. Cal. 1948). “But having recourse to the Act, which as I have indicated before is an Act which confers limited and narrow jurisdiction upon this court, I do not find anything in the Act concerning any prerequisite procedure; such as you will find in the Naturalization Act, 8 U.S.C.A. § 701 et…”
Petition of Boric, 61 F. Supp. 133 (D. Or. 1945). “” 2 8 U.S.C.A. § 701 . 3 Act of October 14, 1940, c.”
United States ex rel. Stabler v. Watkins, 168 F.2d 883 (2d Cir. 1948). “District Courts of the United States are among the courts specified in 8 U.S. C.A. § 701(a). Upon the argument we were told that Stabler made a motion for such relief in January 1947, which was denied in June of that year.”
United States v. Udani, 141 F. Supp. 30 (S.D. Cal. 1956). “ment that he resided in San Diego County, when he resided in Kern County would not have influenced the naturalizing Court because the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Diego, has jurisdiction to naturalize not only residents of San Diego…”
Lugo v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 950 F. Supp. 743 (E.D. Va. 1997). “” If he is citing 8 U.S.C. § 701 , the court notes that this statute related to jurisdiction to naturalize was repealed on June 27, 1952, and replaced by 8 U.”
United States ex rel. Volpe v. Jordan, 161 F.2d 390 (7th Cir. 1947). “701(357) enumerates the courts upon whom jurisdiction has been conferred, including “all courts of record in any State.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 701(a) — 1 case
United States ex rel. Stabler v. Watkins, 168 F.2d 883 (2d Cir. 1948). “District Courts of the United States are among the courts specified in 8 U.S. C.A. § 701(a). Upon the argument we were told that Stabler made a motion for such relief in January 1947, which was denied in June of that year.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.