Utah Code » Title 34, Chapter 44 — Sales Representative Commission Payment Act; part 34-44-2 — Requirements and Prohibitions
Utah Code

Utah Code § 34-44-201 (2026)

Written business relationship

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The business relationship between a sales representative and a principal shall be in a writing signed by both the principal and the sales representative.
The writing required by Subsection (1) shall set forth the method by which the sales representative's commission is:
computed; and
paid.
The principal shall provide the sales representative with a copy of the signed writing required by Subsection (1).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Williamson v. MGS By Design, 2022 UT 40 (Utah 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Williamson v. MGS By Design, 2022 UT 40 (Utah 2022). · cites it 7× “¶10 MGS filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the Act bars the claim because the parties‟ business relationship was never put into a _____________________________________________________________ 6 See UTAH CODE §§ 34-44-201 to -203 (2018). 7 See id. §§ 34-44-301 to -302.”
— Utah Code § 34-44-201(1) — 1 case
Williamson v. MGS By Design, 2022 UT 40 (Utah 2022). “¶10 MGS filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the Act bars the claim because the parties‟ business relationship was never put into a _____________________________________________________________ 6 See UTAH CODE §§ 34-44-201 to -203 (2018). 7 See id. §§ 34-44-301 to -302.”
— Utah Code § 34-44-201(2) — 1 case
Williamson v. MGS By Design, 2022 UT 40 (Utah 2022). “¶10 MGS filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the Act bars the claim because the parties‟ business relationship was never put into a _____________________________________________________________ 6 See UTAH CODE §§ 34-44-201 to -203 (2018). 7 See id. §§ 34-44-301 to -302.”
— Utah Code § 34-44-201(3) — 1 case
Williamson v. MGS By Design, 2022 UT 40 (Utah 2022). “¶10 MGS filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the Act bars the claim because the parties‟ business relationship was never put into a _____________________________________________________________ 6 See UTAH CODE §§ 34-44-201 to -203 (2018). 7 See id. §§ 34-44-301 to -302.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.