Utah Code » Title 41, Chapter 22 — Off-highway Vehicles
Utah Code

Utah Code § 41-22-10.1 (2026)

Vehicles operated on posted public land

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Currently registered off-highway vehicles may be operated on public land, trails, streets, or highways that are posted by sign or designated by map or description as open to off-highway vehicle use by the controlling federal, state, county, or municipal agency.
The controlling federal, state, county, or municipal agency may:
provide a map or description showing or describing land, trails, streets, or highways open to off-highway vehicle use; or
post signs designating lands, trails, streets, or highways open to off-highway vehicle use.
Liability may not be imposed on any federal, state, county, or municipality relating to the designation or maintenance of any land, trail, street, or highway open for off-highway vehicle use.
A violation of this section is an infraction.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1991–2011 · leading case: The Wilderness Soc. v. Kane Cnty., Utah, 632 F.3d 1162 (10th Cir. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
The Wilderness Soc. v. Kane Cnty., Utah, 632 F.3d 1162 (10th Cir. 2011). · cites it 2× “Moreover, the ordinance itself explicitly noted that Kane County claims authority to designate roads pursuant to state law, specifically Utah Code §§ 41-22-10.1 and -10.5, which allow Utah Counties to designate roadways by posting signs.”
Jerz v. Salt Lake Cnty., 822 P.2d 770 (Utah 1991). · cites it 2× “Significantly, in section 41-22-10.1 of that chapter, operation of off-highway vehicles was authorized on public lands, streets, or highways which had been “posted by sign or designated by map by the controlling federal, state, county or city agency as open to off-highway…”
The Wilderness Soc. v. Kane Cnty., Utah, 632 F.3d 1162 (10th Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “Perhaps recognizing this, the dissent falls back and tries to suggest that Kane County is actually asserting a state law interest arising from Utah Code §§ 41-22-10.1, -10.5, 72-3-103, -105 that a Supremacy Clause claim could remedy.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.